# About the invisd flow around an airfoil

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 July 16, 2005, 03:37 About the invisd flow around an airfoil #1 maximus Guest   Posts: n/a Hi,I cam writing a code for compressible flow. In my code,I use the pressure-based method such as SIMPLE which has been extended to the compressible flow by including the density corrections. The code is orginally written for viscous flow by solving the N-S equations, while I can get the invisid results by setting the viscosity equal zero. Untill now I have finished the validation computations such as the flow in a nozzle and flow in a tunnel with an arc bump, and the results are in good agreement with the results of other authors. But when I turn to the flow around an airfoil, I find that it doesn't work.In the computation, I use the first-order up-wind algorithm for the convetion terms. After carefully debuging, I find that the coefficients of the discretized momentum equations are zero in some nodes near the wall in the staganation region which terminated the computation. I try to solve this problem by set the coefficient to be 1e-30 when it is zero, but it doesn't work. Because there is no diffusion term in the invisd solution,so in the stagnation region there is the possiblity for the coeefficents to be zero when the flow is reverse to the wall at the begining of the computation. I don't know how to deal with this problem, so I wonder if anybody can give me some suggestions. I will be very grateful for any suggestions. Thanks!!

 July 16, 2005, 15:04 Re: About the invisd flow around an airfoil #2 Ahmed Guest   Posts: n/a Computer arithmetic is not the same as human arithmetic, when you set the viscosity coefficient equal to zero, in a Navier-Stokes solver, you assume that all viscous dissipation terms will be equal to zero, but the computer programme, specially when using FORTRAN, still computes these terms and at the end of a computation cycle, these terms that you assumed equal to zero, are not. Either you use Double precision math or higher (If using the C language) or modify your code to solve Eulers equation. If you have access to a commercial programme, repeat your calculations setting mu equal to zero and compare the results. Feed back on this point is important

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post CD adapco Group Marketing CD-adapco 3 June 21, 2011 08:33 dfmona Main CFD Forum 0 April 13, 2010 23:32 guess Main CFD Forum 8 March 20, 2010 14:54 Dave Main CFD Forum 3 April 24, 2008 17:11 Quarkz Main CFD Forum 2 January 6, 2006 11:56

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:59.