Should the %3d%3d in GeometricFieldstorePrevIter be %3d

cpplabs · February 10, 2008, 17:27

Hi,
Should the "==" be "=" in the following function? I guess it is supposed to do a copy and "=" should be used instead of "==".
Thnaks.
===============================================
// Store previous iteration field
template<class> class PatchField, class GeoMesh>
void Foam::GeometricField<type,>::storePrevIter() const
{
if (!fieldPrevIterPtr_)
{
if (debug)
{
Info<< "Allocating previous iteration field" << endl
<<>info() << endl;
}

fieldPrevIterPtr_ =
new GeometricField<type,>(*this);
}
else
{
*fieldPrevIterPtr_ == *this;
}
}

hjasak · February 10, 2008, 17:39

No: == is a forced assignment version of =

February 10, 2008, 17:27	Hi, Should the "==" be "="	#1
cpplabs New Member J. T. Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 12 Rep Power: 17	Hi, Should the "==" be "=" in the following function? I guess it is supposed to do a copy and "=" should be used instead of "==". Thnaks. =============================================== // Store previous iteration field template<class> class PatchField, class GeoMesh> void Foam::GeometricField<type,>::storePrevIter() const { if (!fieldPrevIterPtr_) { if (debug) { Info<< "Allocating previous iteration field" << endl <<>info() << endl; } fieldPrevIterPtr_ = new GeometricField<type,>(this); } else { fieldPrevIterPtr_ == *this; } }

February 10, 2008, 17:39	No: == is a forced assignment	#2
hjasak Senior Member Hrvoje Jasak Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: London, England Posts: 1,905 Rep Power: 33	No: == is a forced assignment version of = __________________ Hrvoje Jasak Providing commercial FOAM/OpenFOAM and CFD Consulting: http://wikki.co.uk