|
[Sponsors] |
March 9, 2010, 21:14 |
Need modification for MUSLE or MC schemes
|
#1 |
New Member
Liu Huafei
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Shanghai, China
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 17 |
Maybe the MUSCL scheme is same as the MC scheme? Please check them
in the MUSCL.H and MC.H MUSCL.H 75 scalar r = LimiterFunc::r 76 ( 77 faceFlux, phiP, phiN, gradcP, gradcN, d 78 ); 79 80 return max(min(min(2*r, 0.5*r + 0.5), 2), 0); MC.H 76 scalar r = LimiterFunc::r 77 ( 78 faceFlux, phiP, phiN, gradcP, gradcN, d 79 ); 80 81 return max(min(min(2*r, 0.5*(1 + r)), 2), 0); Another question: Now most of the openFOAM's high resolution schemes are based on TVD. Many famous NVD schemes such as SMART are not implemented in the openFOAM. What is the reason? Is the implementation of NVD schemes is more difficult than that of TVD schemes? |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
time stepping schemes for compressible DNS/LES | shyamdsundar | Main CFD Forum | 0 | January 14, 2010 23:15 |
ENERGY CONSERVATION SCHEMES! | Science Seeker | Main CFD Forum | 1 | May 24, 2001 12:13 |
Advection schemes for LES | kalyan | Main CFD Forum | 2 | May 17, 2001 13:43 |
TVD Schemes | Matt Umbel | Main CFD Forum | 1 | January 25, 2000 04:21 |
Higher-order bounded convection schemes for pure advection with discontinuity | Anthony | Main CFD Forum | 3 | June 13, 1999 02:36 |