|
[Sponsors] |
February 10, 2011, 06:13 |
Inconsistency in Launder-Sharma k-e model?
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Vesselin Krastev
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: University of Tor Vergata, Rome
Posts: 368
Rep Power: 20 |
Hi all, actually I'm not sure if this is a real bug or not, but I have some questions about the Launder-Sharma model implementation in OpenFOAM (1.6). The literature about this model tells me that, in order to avoid a singular behavior of the sink term in the epsilon equation, the epsilon itself could be replaced with a quantity called epsilonTilda, which is equal to:
epsilonTilda=epsilon-2*nu*magSqr(grad(sqrt(k)) Well, looking at the source code, it seems like the epsilon equation is solved for epsilonTilda, and after that the "corrected" epsilon (epsilonTilda + 2*nu*...) is used as a sink term for the k-equation. However, in all other formulas or equations where epsilon is needed (in particular the turbulent eddy viscosity formula and the calculation of Ret for the damping functions), epsilonTilda is used instead...Maybe I'm missing something, but this sounds not so consistent to me as, in general, epsilon and epsilonTilda are not the same. Can anybody correct me or give some explanation for this? Thank you all V. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Superlinear speedup in OpenFOAM 13 | msrinath80 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 18 | March 3, 2015 05:36 |
multi fluid mixture model issue | rystokes | CFX | 3 | August 9, 2009 19:13 |
Problems with Launder and Sharma model | vertnik | Main CFD Forum | 1 | May 20, 2009 11:40 |
LES and combustion model | Margherita Cadorin | CFX | 0 | October 29, 2008 05:24 |
Launder & Sharma model in combusion case | Richard Carroni | Main CFD Forum | 1 | November 17, 1998 18:59 |