|
[Sponsors] |
[snappyHexMesh] need to improve my mesh, feature snapping doesn't fully work |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
December 16, 2014, 05:36 |
need to improve my mesh, feature snapping doesn't fully work
|
#1 |
Member
amine
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: FRANCE
Posts: 84
Rep Power: 12 |
Dear,
I need your help to improve my mesh You can see a problematic mesh in picture My snappyHexMesh file Code:
/*--------------------------------*- C++ -*----------------------------------*\ | ========= | | | \\ / F ield | OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox | | \\ / O peration | Version: 2.3.0 | | \\ / A nd | Web: www.OpenFOAM.org | | \\/ M anipulation | | \*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ FoamFile { version 2.0; format ascii; class dictionary; object snappyHexMeshDict; } // * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * // castellatedMesh true; snap true; addLayers true; geometry { cuve1.stl { type triSurfaceMesh; name cuve1; } cuve2.stl { type triSurfaceMesh; name cuve2; } cuve3.stl { type triSurfaceMesh; name cuve3; } H3.stl { type triSurfaceMesh; name H3; } H4.stl { type triSurfaceMesh; name H4; } shaft.stl { type triSurfaceMesh; name shaft; } } castellatedMeshControls { features ( { file "H3.eMesh"; levels ((0.01 3)); } { file "H4.eMesh"; levels ((0.01 3)); } ); refinementSurfaces { cuve1 { level ( 1 1 ); } cuve2 { level ( 1 1 ); } cuve3 { level ( 1 1 ); } H3 { level ( 2 2 ); } H4 { level ( 2 2 ); } shaft { level ( 2 2 ); } } refinementRegions { } locationInMesh ( 0 0 0); maxLocalCells 100000; maxGlobalCells 2000000; minRefinementCells 0; nCellsBetweenLevels 1; resolveFeatureAngle 30.0; allowFreeStandingZoneFaces true; planarAngle 30; maxLoadUnbalance 0.1; } snapControls { nSolveIter 30; nSmoothPatch 3; tolerance 2.0; nRelaxIter 5; nFeatureSnapIter 10; implicitFeatureSnap true; explicitFeatureSnap true; multiRegionFeatureSnap true; } addLayersControls { layers { cuve2 { nSurfaceLayers 3; } cuve3 { nSurfaceLayers 3; } H3 { nSurfaceLayers 3; } H4 { nSurfaceLayers 3; } shaft { nSurfaceLayers 3; } } relativeSizes true; expansionRatio 1.0; finalLayerThickness 0.3; minThickness 0.25; nGrow 0; featureAngle 130; slipFeatureAngle 30; nRelaxIter 5; nSmoothSurfaceNormals 1; nSmoothNormals 3; nSmoothThickness 10; maxFaceThicknessRatio 0.5; maxThicknessToMedialRatio 0.3; minMedianAxisAngle 90; nBufferCellsNoExtrude 0; nLayerIter 50; nRelaxedIter 20; } meshQualityControls { maxNonOrtho 65; maxBoundarySkewness 20; maxInternalSkewness 4; maxConcave 80; minFlatness 0.5; minVol 1.0E-13; minTetQuality 1.0E-15; minArea -1.0; minTwist 0.02; minDeterminant 0.001; minFaceWeight 0.05; minVolRatio 0.01; minTriangleTwist -1.0; nSmoothScale 4; errorReduction 0.75; } debug 0; mergeTolerance 1.0E-6; autoBlockMesh false; |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[snappyHexMesh] No satisfying result with feature edge refinement | Krapf | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 5 | December 13, 2019 06:59 |
[snappyHexMesh] Creating multiple multiple cell zones with snappyHexMesh - a newbie in deep water! | divergence | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 0 | January 23, 2019 04:17 |
[snappyHexMesh] SnappyHexMesh for internal Flow | vishwa | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 24 | June 27, 2016 08:54 |
[snappyHexMesh] SHM: feature edge snapping not conforming | thab | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 3 | November 26, 2012 14:04 |
Icemcfd 11: Loss of mesh from surface mesh option? | Joe | CFX | 2 | March 26, 2007 18:10 |