|
[Sponsors] | |||||
create STL file with zero thickness plates with surfaceMeshTriangulate |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Tim Gronarz
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Aachen
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 3 ![]() |
Hi,
i am trying to generate an STL file from a Fluent/Gambit Mesh (*.msh) with surfaceMeshTriangulate for mesh generation with SnappyHexMesh . The surfacemesh contains plates with zero thickness (like a baffle), that are not connected to a wall on each side. After the creation of the STL file with surfaceMeshTriangulate, these plates have disappeared. I believe that the reason is that the STL Format is used to describe Volumes and subsequently the plates are ignored. Is that true? Is there a way to keep these plates? Additionally, if i add a plate by hand, snappyHexMesh does not snap the STL correctly. At the edges that are not connected to a Wall, the Mesh looks badly deformed. Why is that? Kind regards Tim |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
matteo lombardi
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 58
Rep Power: 6 ![]() |
Hello Tim,
I am trying to use snappyHExMesh on a zero thickness geometry like you did and indeeed the result is not very satisfactory.. The edges of the surface are not snapped at all.. Have you managed to find a way to resolve the issue? Thanks,matteo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
New Member
Tim Gronarz
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Aachen
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 3 ![]() |
Hi Matteo,
i did not find a way. But i did some research on the STL format. It is designed for the representation of volumes, and since a zero thickness plate is not a volume, it might be a reason why the "surface mesh triangulate" tool can't create STL Files from other geometry files that include zero thickness plates. It is possible to create stl files containing zero thickness parts with other CAD Tools and mesh them with snappyHexMesh. But if you take a look at the windshield (a 2D geometry) of the motorcycle in the motorcycle tutorial, you will find that the upper edge is snapped very poor. I believe snappyHexMesh is not capable to mesh zero thickness geometries correctly for now. If anyone knows how to mesh zero thickness geometries with snappyHexMesh, feel free to reply. Kind regards, Tim |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Vieri Abolaffio
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Always on the move.
Posts: 301
Rep Power: 5 ![]() |
I have to confirm the TimG's word about it. it is really hard if not impossible to use a 0 thinckness stl file.
to overcome this i usually have two options: 1) if my cell number permit, i use a solid with very low thickness and use it normally. take keep in mind that you can scale the mesh after the sHM phase, so it is possible, if your geometry permit, to have s sensible thickness in the z dimension, mesh it, and then scale the mesh to keep it as low as possible. you can find examples (but applied to 3d body) in the wigley hull tutorial (LTSInetrFoam 2) use external meshing sw. good luck. |
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| snappyhexmesh, stl, surfacemeshtriangulate |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2.0.x on Mac OSX | niklas | OpenFOAM Installation on Windows, Mac and other Unsupported Platforms | 74 | March 28, 2012 16:46 |
| pisoFoam compiling error with OF 1.7.1 on MAC OSX | Greg Givogue | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 3 | March 4, 2011 17:18 |
| OpenFOAM 1.7.1 installation problem on OpenSUSE 11.3 | flakid | OpenFOAM Installation | 16 | December 28, 2010 08:48 |
| Actuator disk model | audrich | FLUENT | 0 | September 21, 2009 07:06 |
| Results saving in CFD | hawk | Main CFD Forum | 16 | July 21, 2005 20:51 |