|
[Sponsors] | |||||
forceCoeffs (OpenFOAM 2.2.0) gave another values of Cd in comparison results2.2.1 ! |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Alexander Lavrov
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Deal all,
I solved very simple problem: laminar cylinder (Re=20) in flow using OpenFOAM 2.1.1. I used blockMesh instrument. (number of cells: 78000) The cylinder is divided into 8 parts. I received Cd which coincides with experiment. Today I run the same problem on OpenFOAM 2.2.0. The Cd is approximately 4 times smaller. It differs from my previous calculations and from experiment. I suppose that something have change in the rules concerning forceCoeffs. But I did not find answer in 2.2.0 manual. Please help me! Thank you very much in advance. Alexander. Last edited by lavrov; March 15, 2013 at 11:16. |
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| 2.1.1, 2.2.0, cylinder, differences, laminar |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Ansys/Fluent and OpenFoam comparison, LES, XiFoam, Smagorinsky | achinta | OpenFOAM | 5 | June 11, 2012 12:48 |
| Comparison OpenFOAM Fluent Experiment | andras | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 20 | June 20, 2011 15:06 |
| Comparison of axisymmetric case, Starccm+ and OpenFOAM | linnemann | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 12 | June 16, 2011 05:43 |
| Superlinear speedup in OpenFOAM 13 | msrinath80 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 17 | August 22, 2009 03:59 |
| 64bitrhel5 OF installation instructions | mirko | OpenFOAM Installation | 2 | August 12, 2008 18:07 |