CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Pre-Processing

inject particles of different densities - kinematiccloud

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree2Likes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   August 18, 2016, 00:21
Default
  #21
New Member
 
Zahra Hsh
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 9
zizi63 is on a distinguished road
Hi Kevin,
Maybe like the coal example we should use two separate kinematic cloud properties, if it works for you will you please inform me?
zizi63 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 18, 2017, 14:32
Default
  #22
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 63
Rep Power: 10
Scram_1 is on a distinguished road
Hello!
Has anyone managed to inject particles of different densities through two different patches?

My case is a Y - junction with 2 inlets and 1 outlet. I want to analyze the mixing pattern of the particles. For this, I want my particles to be colored differently, say white particles injected from the top inlet and black from the bottom inlet. If this were the case then I can easily see the mixing pattern. The problem is, since the particles are generated from the same kinematic cloud, they are all colored the same. I don't think it's possible to generate 2 kinematic clouds using icoUncoupledKinematicParcelFoam because in the .C file, the cloud is generated using kinematicCloud.evolve(). So if I have 'two' clouds, the second one will overwrite the first one and effectively there will only be one cloud. I was thinking if particles of different densities are injected, then I can color them differently which will serve my purpose. The easiest way would be to find a way to color the particles based on the patch from which they are injected in ParaView itself. But I couldn't find an option to that effect.

Also, I tried using the coalCloud feature in coalChemistryFoam but it requires a lot of auxiliary information like radiation models, chemistry properties etc. and it's not allowing me to turn off radiation.

Best,
Ram
Scram_1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 30, 2017, 04:42
Default
  #23
Member
 
Andreas Weber
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 37
Rep Power: 11
a.weber is on a distinguished road
Hi,
I'm also planning to do two clouds of totally different properties.... e.g. gas bubbles and catalysator particles.
Differences in calculation are important because:
bubbles should collide and coalesce with each other, cat particles should not.

What i did so far is to just add a second cloud in the createClouds.C:
Code:
Info<< "\nConstructing bubble cloud" << endl;
basicSprayCloud bubbles
(
    "bubbles",
    rho,
    U,
    g,
    slgThermo
);

Info<< "\nConstructing catalysator cloud" << endl;
basicSprayCloud cat
(
    "cat",
    rho,
    U,
    g,
    slgThermo
);
Then I just solve them both in my solver.C:
Code:
Info<< "Time = " << runTime.timeName() << nl << endl;
        bubbles.evolve();
        cat.evolve();
...
This works indeed, I get Info about both Clouds in the Output:
Code:
Solving 3-D cloud bubbles

--> Cloud: bubbles injector: model1
    Added 2 new parcels

Cloud: bubbles
    Current number of parcels       = 3
    Current mass in system          = 8.55318e-08
    Linear momentum                 = (7.09132e-11 1.15702e-11 2.83297e-08)
   |Linear momentum|                = 2.83298e-08
    Linear kinetic energy           = 4.69921e-09
    model1:
        number of parcels added     = 3
        mass introduced             = 8.55318e-08
    Parcels absorbed into film      = 0
    New film detached parcels       = 0
    Parcel fate (number, mass)
      - escape                      = 0, 0
      - stick                       = 0, 0
    Temperature min/max             = 300, 300
    Mass transfer phase change      = 0
    D10, D32, Dmax (mu)             = 3555.08, 3555.08, 3555.11
    Liquid penetration 95% mass (m) = 0.00136594
    hold-up of gasphase             = 0.000230061 %


Solving 3-D cloud cat

--> Cloud: cat injector: model1
    Added 1 new parcels

Cloud: cat
    Current number of parcels       = 2
    Current mass in system          = 1.04145e-09
    Linear momentum                 = (4.5255e-15 3.02526e-15 4.09251e-11)
   |Linear momentum|                = 4.09251e-11
    Linear kinetic energy           = 9.02176e-13
    model1:
        number of parcels added     = 2
        mass introduced             = 4.18879e-09
    Parcels absorbed into film      = 0
    New film detached parcels       = 0
    Parcel fate (number, mass)
      - escape                      = 0, 0
      - stick                       = 0, 0
    Temperature min/max             = 300, 300
    Mass transfer phase change      = 0
    D10, D32, Dmax (mu)             = 100, 100, 100
    Liquid penetration 95% mass (m) = 0.000996569
    hold-up of gasphase             = 0.000230061 %
BUT: Only my first cloud "bubbles" is saved to my lagrangian directory.... the second one "cat" is missing....

Any ideas?

Edit: OK, weird but I just renamed from "cat" to "catalyst" and it is working now.

Best regards
Andreas

Last edited by a.weber; May 30, 2017 at 07:37.
a.weber is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 17, 2017, 04:18
Default
  #24
Member
 
Evangelos
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 87
Rep Power: 14
Danath is on a distinguished road
i 've done the same

the spheres from the first cloud pass through the spheres from the second cloud


any ideas ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by a.weber View Post
Hi,
I'm also planning to do two clouds of totally different properties.... e.g. gas bubbles and catalysator particles.
Differences in calculation are important because:
bubbles should collide and coalesce with each other, cat particles should not.

What i did so far is to just add a second cloud in the createClouds.C:
Code:
Info<< "\nConstructing bubble cloud" << endl;
basicSprayCloud bubbles
(
    "bubbles",
    rho,
    U,
    g,
    slgThermo
);

Info<< "\nConstructing catalysator cloud" << endl;
basicSprayCloud cat
(
    "cat",
    rho,
    U,
    g,
    slgThermo
);
Then I just solve them both in my solver.C:
Code:
Info<< "Time = " << runTime.timeName() << nl << endl;
        bubbles.evolve();
        cat.evolve();
...
This works indeed, I get Info about both Clouds in the Output:
Code:
Solving 3-D cloud bubbles

--> Cloud: bubbles injector: model1
    Added 2 new parcels

Cloud: bubbles
    Current number of parcels       = 3
    Current mass in system          = 8.55318e-08
    Linear momentum                 = (7.09132e-11 1.15702e-11 2.83297e-08)
   |Linear momentum|                = 2.83298e-08
    Linear kinetic energy           = 4.69921e-09
    model1:
        number of parcels added     = 3
        mass introduced             = 8.55318e-08
    Parcels absorbed into film      = 0
    New film detached parcels       = 0
    Parcel fate (number, mass)
      - escape                      = 0, 0
      - stick                       = 0, 0
    Temperature min/max             = 300, 300
    Mass transfer phase change      = 0
    D10, D32, Dmax (mu)             = 3555.08, 3555.08, 3555.11
    Liquid penetration 95% mass (m) = 0.00136594
    hold-up of gasphase             = 0.000230061 %


Solving 3-D cloud cat

--> Cloud: cat injector: model1
    Added 1 new parcels

Cloud: cat
    Current number of parcels       = 2
    Current mass in system          = 1.04145e-09
    Linear momentum                 = (4.5255e-15 3.02526e-15 4.09251e-11)
   |Linear momentum|                = 4.09251e-11
    Linear kinetic energy           = 9.02176e-13
    model1:
        number of parcels added     = 2
        mass introduced             = 4.18879e-09
    Parcels absorbed into film      = 0
    New film detached parcels       = 0
    Parcel fate (number, mass)
      - escape                      = 0, 0
      - stick                       = 0, 0
    Temperature min/max             = 300, 300
    Mass transfer phase change      = 0
    D10, D32, Dmax (mu)             = 100, 100, 100
    Liquid penetration 95% mass (m) = 0.000996569
    hold-up of gasphase             = 0.000230061 %
BUT: Only my first cloud "bubbles" is saved to my lagrangian directory.... the second one "cat" is missing....

Any ideas?

Edit: OK, weird but I just renamed from "cat" to "catalyst" and it is working now.

Best regards
Andreas
Danath is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 19, 2017, 03:49
Default
  #25
Member
 
Andreas Weber
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 37
Rep Power: 11
a.weber is on a distinguished road
In my case, im ok with two seperate clouds, it was intended to not interfrere with each other.

I don't think that there is an easy way to make two clouds collide.. at least not in the original code.

You could try coding a force that is based on theta() (phase fraction) to push away some particles in crowded areas, but it would not stop spheres from moving over each other...

best regards,
Andy
a.weber is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to inject DPM particles using DEFINE_EXECUTE_AT_END(name) ? bawammo Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming 1 October 30, 2017 13:20
how to inject many particles in fluent? elah599 FLUENT 16 April 21, 2017 05:18
inject different sized particles czhao86 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 8 July 8, 2015 20:06
How to inject certain number of particles asal FLUENT 0 April 8, 2013 18:21
Function to inject particles only once? KK CFX 0 March 4, 2008 15:45


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:28.