CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Programming & Development

Backwards Compatibility

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   June 15, 2015, 06:42
Default Backwards Compatibility
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 11
Chris_DSMC is on a distinguished road
Hello Community,

I am currently working on the DSMC-Solver in OpenFOAM. I already made some changes in the code and implemented a new boundary condition. Because I am planing some new features for the Solver, I think there will be some more modifications. Of course we are planing to contribute our changes to the official release of OpenFOAM after our project (if they are interested )

I am wondering how important backwards compatibility is to the community?

To give an example: Like I said, I added a new boundary condition. Because of this I added a new boundaryField called "boundaryRhoN". The existing boundary condition "freeStream" specifies the number density in the "dsmcProperties" file. Now this is a bit contrary to the new boundaryCondition. Now three ways come to my mint:

1) I implement everything clean and let freeStream also use the boundaryRhoN file. In this way it would not be possible to use older Models with my version. (Of course I would update the tutorials)

or

2) I make sure, that it is possible to run the existing tutorials with my version, which of course could be a bit more creepy in the code.

or

3) I completly do not touch the existing boundary condition. (Which I think is no option, because it would lead to double code and would break some other basic rules using object oriented programming with c++)

I am very curious to your answers

Best regards
Chris_DSMC is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 17, 2015, 14:09
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 11
Chris_DSMC is on a distinguished road
Hi there,

do I have to make myself a bit more clear?
If anybody has a hint, for example something I missed in the programmers guide, I would be very grateful.

The question is, if it is allowed to change the user interface of a solver such, that older models are not runable with my version any more.

I am happy for every answer.

Wish you all a nice day.
Chris_DSMC is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
convert *.msh to *.stl and backwards Lilly ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 2 October 22, 2017 20:03
Version Compatibility vish STAR-CCM+ 1 March 19, 2014 14:16
Compatibility of FLUENT & Hypermesh preshitupadhye FLUENT 0 October 27, 2010 11:47
data compatibility Shuo Main CFD Forum 0 November 20, 2008 22:48
Backwards compatibility of Fluent 6.3 with 6.2 Brian FLUENT 1 April 4, 2007 21:52


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:47.