CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

Max Courant Number exploded

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   January 18, 2017, 04:54
Default Max Courant Number exploded
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 12
ali11 is on a distinguished road
Hi all,

I am trying a simulation of venturi meter type geometry. For this, i am using pimpleFoam, after few time step there is tremendous increase of max courant Number and then program get stop.
For futher reference i am attaching geometry, error, blockMeshDict and ControlDict files.

Any suggestion is highly appreciated.

Thanks in advance
Attached Images
File Type: png Geometry.PNG (17.1 KB, 50 views)
Attached Files
File Type: txt Error.txt (1.1 KB, 15 views)
File Type: txt CheckMesh.txt (1.9 KB, 26 views)
File Type: txt blockMeshDict.txt (2.9 KB, 21 views)
File Type: txt controlDict.txt (1.2 KB, 8 views)
ali11 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 18, 2017, 12:12
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 11
sati is on a distinguished road
Hi,

It seems that your mesh isn't good enough : 85 max non-orthogonality is quite high.
Try to improve your mesh, and it should be better.

Regards,
Sati
sati is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 18, 2017, 12:56
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
sheaker's Avatar
 
Oskar
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Poland
Posts: 184
Rep Power: 10
sheaker is on a distinguished road
Hello.
As sati said, You have high non-orthogonality in Your mesh.
Also... Is Your case really 54m^3? Or maybe You forgot to transform units from [mm] to [m]?
sheaker is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 20, 2017, 01:36
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 12
ali11 is on a distinguished road
Thanks sati and sheaker for you response.

As i change the solver from pimpleFoam to icoFoam, simulation run well with this mesh. For this, i tried different schemes in fvSchemes file in icoFoam. I am attaching file for which my simulation going well.

Moreover, yes Sheaker, i forget to transform my geometry into mm.

Again my question, is non-orthogonality affect my simulation in pimpleFoam.

How to improve the non-orthogonality? Is different blocking strategy will improve the non-orthogonality?

Thanks
Attached Files
File Type: txt fvSchemes.txt (1.4 KB, 16 views)
ali11 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 20, 2017, 03:19
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 11
sati is on a distinguished road
You can indeed improve your mesh with a different blocking.
You are using a single block to mesh a cylinder. This is not optimal : the cells situated at the corner of your block are very distorted. To improve that, you can use a blocking similar to the one used in the following picture :

sati is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 20, 2017, 04:20
Default
  #6
New Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 12
ali11 is on a distinguished road
thank you sati!

I got your point.
ali11 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[Other] Can't Shake Erros: patch type 'patch' not constraint type 'empty' BrendaEM OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 12 April 3, 2022 18:32
decomposePar problem: Cell 0contains face labels out of range vaina74 OpenFOAM Pre-Processing 37 July 20, 2020 05:38
Problem of simulating of small droplet with radius of 2mm liguifan OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 5 June 3, 2014 02:53
dynamic Mesh is faster than MRF???? sharonyue OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 14 August 26, 2013 07:47
same geometry,structured and unstructured mesh,different behaviour. sharonyue OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 13 January 2, 2013 22:40


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:54.