CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

pimpleDyMFoam issue for pitching foil

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   November 20, 2012, 11:18
Default pimpleDyMFoam issue for pitching foil
  #1
PLD
New Member
 
Pierre-Luc Delafin
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: France
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 5
PLD is on a distinguished road
Hi,

I have a problem using pimpleDyMFoam when simulating a pitching hydrofoil (pitching from 0 to 15): the solution converges but the lift coefficient is lower than expected, up to 50% ! The expected values come from CFX AND experiments so I think they are reliable.
I use OpenFOAM 2.1.1 with the k-omega SST turbulence model. I have tried two different ways to obtain the pitching but both give bad results :
- deforming mesh (dynamicMotionSolverFvMesh)
- sliding mesh (AMI)
I have read in other threads that pimpleDyMFoam may be unstable for CFL higher than 2 so I chose an adaptive time step with CFL = 1 (I have also tested fixed time steps dt=10^-5 and dt=10^-4).
I have tested 3 different meshes (22k, 41k and 76k cells).
I have tested 2 different angular velocities (6/s and 63/s).
Results of all these different tests differ a little but none of them gives good results...

It is strange because calculations at fixed angles of attack with simpleFoam and pimpleFoam give very good results for both lift and drag coefficients.

Do you have an idea regarding this issue ? Does it come from the solver pimpleDyMFoam ?

Thanks in advance,
Best Regards,
PLD is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 21, 2012, 04:39
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Olivier
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: France, grenoble
Posts: 238
Rep Power: 9
olivierG is on a distinguished road
hello,

I would try with fixed smaller time step.
How many iteration / time do you need to converge with SimpleFoam / PimpleFoam ? =>
I guess your pitching is too fast to catch the physics.
So try to lower time step, or look for a more coupled solver.

regards,
olivier
olivierG is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 23, 2012, 03:59
Default
  #3
PLD
New Member
 
Pierre-Luc Delafin
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: France
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 5
PLD is on a distinguished road
Hello,

Thank you for your reply. I have tried with a fixed time step of 10^-6 but it still gives bad results (approximately the same as with dt=10^-5 and with the adaptive time step CFL=1). I don't think the problem comes from the time step since the 6/s case is a quasi-static case (reduced frequency = 0.18) and should not require such small time steps. I know I should not compare the two codes, but CFX only requires dt = 10^-3 for this case...
For the pimpleFoam calculation at an angle of attack of 10, which showed good results, I used the following parameters:

PIMPLE
{
//correctPhi yes;
nOuterCorrectors 2;
nCorrectors 5;
nNonOrthogonalCorrectors 1;
pRefCell 0;
pRefValue 0;
}

The time step was 5x10^-4 and the lift coefficient was converged after 2000 time steps.

I now try to use OF 1.6-ext to check if it gives better results (I suppose it has more experience with this kind of simulation).

When you say "look for a more coupled solver", to what solver do you think ?

Regards,
PLD is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
foil, lift and drag, pimpledymfoam, pitching

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Floating point exception with pimpleDyMFoam ebah6 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 8 May 13, 2013 09:01
Error with pimpleDyMFoam samiam1000 OpenFOAM 2 June 11, 2012 06:21
Pressure boundary condition issue Vijay FLUENT 0 April 6, 2012 13:35
Relative flux in pimpleDyMFoam Igor_2011 OpenFOAM 0 July 20, 2011 17:50
Meshing related issue in Flow EFD appu FloEFD, FloWorks & FloTHERM 1 May 22, 2011 08:27


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:28.