|
[Sponsors] |
March 20, 2013, 09:25 |
|
#3 |
New Member
ALI
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Erlangen
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
Hi eddi,
I am also having trouble with parallel run of chtMRF, in my case a slight difference is that i am using the solver with view factor radiation model. when I run on 2 processors of the same machine/node , the performance is worse than for on 1 processor. my mesh is only 500,000. cells (0.5 million), but still. I am suspecting that it is because of the way the domain is decomposed. can you tell me which method you are using for domain decomposition in the decomposeParDict file ? and how can we decompose the domain according to the regions we already have , like fluid region goes to 1processor and solid region to another ? Thanx. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
parallel performance on BX900 | uzawa | OpenFOAM Installation | 3 | September 5, 2011 15:52 |
Performance of GGI case in parallel | hannes | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 26 | August 3, 2011 03:07 |
Parallel operation of chtMultiRegionFoam | pizzaice | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | February 5, 2010 11:38 |
Parallel performance OpenFoam Vs Fluent | prapanj | Main CFD Forum | 0 | March 26, 2009 05:43 |
ANSYS CFX 10.0 Parallel Performance for Windows XP | Saturn | CFX | 4 | August 13, 2006 12:27 |