|
[Sponsors] |
July 4, 2013, 09:32 |
Another Questions about BC
|
#1 |
New Member
Hendrik
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Germany
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 12 |
hey guys,
i'm very new in CFD and even newer in OpenFoam and I have a question about the BC in turbulence modelling. My task is the comparison of different turbulence models in different geometries. It would be very good to know how the parameters of epsilon and k in the k/epsilon-model have to be set. Is there any formula for calculation these parameters or are there any standard parameters for walls and in-/outlets? It's the same problem for other turbulence models like k/omega etc. thank you |
|
July 9, 2013, 08:06 |
|
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 60
Rep Power: 13 |
Hi,
turbulent fields are generally set based on some pre-defined input, say turbulent intensity. If you are simulating pipe flow, you know roughly how much fluctuations you can expect and you calculate the fields based on that. To know how to do it, you can follow : http://www.cfd-online.com/Wiki/Turbu...ary_conditions achyutan |
|
July 9, 2013, 11:07 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Artur
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Southampton, UK
Posts: 372
Rep Power: 19 |
Make sure you pay attention to the turbulence intensity and turbulent length scale and how to estimate them, e.g. like advised here:
http://www.cfd-online.com/Wiki/Turbulence_intensity and here: http://www.cfd-online.com/Wiki/Turbulent_length_scale |
|
July 9, 2013, 11:52 |
|
#4 |
New Member
Hendrik
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Germany
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 12 |
those pages are great, thanks for that.
But how bad can the results become, if I put wrong parameters for k, epsilon and omega in? With other words: Is it true, that those parameters are only the start parameters for time step 0 and they will be improved during the simulation? Am I right, if I think that the solution converged in less time with "good" start parameters? thank you Hendrik |
|
July 9, 2013, 11:56 |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
Artur
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Southampton, UK
Posts: 372
Rep Power: 19 |
I am not an experienced user so I may be wrong but I think you are right in saying that these are just the starting values. Question is, will you run your simulation long enough for them to reach the correct values? Hence the importance of setting them right in the first place (also this speeds up the convergence).
|
|
July 9, 2013, 12:03 |
|
#6 |
New Member
Hendrik
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Germany
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 12 |
At the moment I'm running my simulation as long as it stops because the solution is converged and OpenFoam ends automatically the simulation.
perhaps this is too long? I don't know! |
|
July 10, 2013, 03:30 |
|
#7 |
Senior Member
Artur
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Southampton, UK
Posts: 372
Rep Power: 19 |
Ah, fair enough. I'm used to running transient solvers. If you are running a steady one and it converges then you should be OK I think.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Questions on a pressure profile | saisanthoshm88 | Main CFD Forum | 2 | March 29, 2013 05:03 |
[UDF for Mass transfer with VOF] couple of questions | sooroo3 | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 2 | February 14, 2013 21:38 |
possible interview questions | atturh | Main CFD Forum | 1 | February 21, 2012 08:53 |
NACA0012 Validation Case Questions | ozzythewise | Main CFD Forum | 3 | August 3, 2010 14:39 |
Few questions | phi | FLUENT | 0 | March 4, 2005 09:23 |