CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

Turbulence-model: OpenFOAM vs Fluent

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree3Likes
  • 2 Post By Bernhard
  • 1 Post By Mirage12

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old   August 2, 2013, 08:38
Default Turbulence-model: OpenFOAM vs Fluent
  #1
Member
 
Amin
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 76
Rep Power: 13
Mirage12 is on a distinguished road
I would like to compare the Turbulence-models in OpenFOAM and Fluent.

I used the same mesh and the same boundaries conditions, for this kind of comparison :

The following models were used for Re=3900 :

SpalartAllmaras
kOmegaSST
kEpsilon


Please find the cases here : http://www.workupload.com/file/jTi8N8K


But the results are not at all matching !!!

in the attachment, you find the screen shot of the velocity contours using Fluent.
Could you please explain me, what is the reason of this big difference what is wrong ? what should I change ?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg cylinder.jpg (81.2 KB, 94 views)
Mirage12 is offline   Reply With Quote

 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Use of k-epsilon and k-omega Models Jade M Main CFD Forum 40 January 27, 2023 07:18
Define new turbulence model in Fluent micro11sl Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming 55 October 27, 2016 17:25
Superlinear speedup in OpenFOAM 13 msrinath80 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 18 March 3, 2015 05:36
Is it possible to model natural convection in a 2D horizontal model in fluent caitoc FLUENT 1 May 5, 2014 13:32
Reynolds Stress model in CFX vs Fluent Tim CFX 1 October 7, 2009 06:19


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:29.