# Differences between simpleFoam an turbFoam

 User Name Remember Me Password
 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
 September 30, 2005, 07:33 I'm wondering if I'm right or #1 Senior Member   Francois Beaubert Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Lille, France Posts: 142 Rep Power: 9 I'm wondering if I'm right or not when I compare the differences between simpleFoam and turbfoam: * both are for incompressible flow and resolve the Naviers-Stokes equation with RANS closure. * turbFoam is for unsteady simulation and use the PISO algorithm. * simpleFoam is for steady simulation and use the simple algorithm. In the usermanual we can see that simpleFoam is for non-newtonian flow. But is this application still usable for Newtonian flow ? Furthermore, I have a few question about the use of lowreynolds number RANS model: * do we have to check the Y+ before running a low or High reynolds RANS model (like in fluent). So, must the mesh be reffined near the wall accordingly: - Y+>40 for highReynolds RANS models - y+=1 for lowReynolds RANS models And for the statistics (like mean velocity and pressure fields): the simpleFoam application gives the mean fields while for the turbFoam application we have to compute them. In this case are they already computed in turbFoam and if so with which variable can we access them. Thank's a lot for your answer. I know this question may be stupid but I'm new to OpenFOAM and C++ Regards Francois

 September 30, 2005, 08:30 1. simpleFoam uses the SIMPLE #2 Member   Pierre Le Fur Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: UK Posts: 60 Rep Power: 9 1. simpleFoam uses the SIMPLE algorithm and can be used fot BOTH newtonian or non-newtonian fluids, you just have to specify the viscosity model in the constant/transportProperties file 2. One can specify which turbulence model to use in constant/turbulentProperties file. Depending on the model you use, you have indeed to create a mesh adequate for that model, you can check Y+ with the checkYplus utility for example. 3. run the turbFoam tutorial it will answer all the questions about variable available, but again depending on the flow you compute the converged result can be unsteady or steady, you can use turbFoam to calculate a steady-state calculation, the time step becomes a kind of iteration counter similar to simpleFoam then J'espere que ca aide Pierre

 September 30, 2005, 09:54 Tanks Pierre for your answer, #3 Senior Member   Francois Beaubert Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Lille, France Posts: 142 Rep Power: 9 Tanks Pierre for your answer, I have already run this tutorial but I must admit that it was not in depth. Good luck for your PhD ... with OpenFOAM it will be funy ... Francois

 November 15, 2005, 15:03 How does one check yplus for c #4 New Member   Jeff Allen Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 11 Rep Power: 9 How does one check yplus for compressible, turbulent cases? For example using k-epsilon. Thanks Jeff

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post braennstroem OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 June 19, 2008 10:43 lakeat OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 4 January 18, 2008 13:13 philippose OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 November 26, 2006 11:24 rogerio OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 2 June 13, 2005 07:16 phil FLUENT 1 September 5, 2003 06:36

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:16.

 Contact Us - CFD Online - Top