CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

Convergence

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree3Likes
  • 2 Post By Henry Weller (Henry)
  • 1 Post By Henry Weller (Henry)

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old   January 5, 2005, 14:14
Default Dear Sirs, I know OpenFOAM
  #1
Luiz Eduardo Bittencourt Sampaio (Sampaio)
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Dear Sirs,

I know OpenFOAM is tunned to achieve better performance than comercial codes in good meshes, and I can gladly see it do so.

However I am having some problems with convergence with kepsilon model (also tried LRR, and a v2f I implemented myself - still testing). I dont think my mesh is that bad, but I would like to tunne my parameters so that I get a more robust solver.

Does anyone out there has any guidelines on schemes and parameters towards a more robust solver?

I have observed some issues regarding kepsilon, for instance:

1- if I set the tolerance for k and epsilon equation to 10^-5, my solution blows up. Setting it to 0.001 corrects it, but it limits my accuracy to 0.001, where I would like it to be much better.

2- velocity usually converge faster, while pressure residuals stagnate at some level. Is there a way to modify those parameters so that pressure converges faster?

3- I tried to use other solvers, since I thought I might be having trouble because of coupling between the equations (mostly in my v2f implementation). Is it right to say a GaussSeidel solver is more robust when there is a strong coupling than a BICCG? I set number of sweeps to 1 and relative tolerance to 0.999 to guarantee that I was "mixing well" the equations (one sweep for each variable). Is there a misconception? (I know it is slower). Do you think BICCG could do as a good job as GaussSeidel in strongly coupled systems, while still being much faster? (Would you limit the number of iterations the same way I did for GS?)

I apreciate any comments and help.
Luiz
  Reply With Quote

 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
URF and convergence in natural convergence Marie-Anne Main CFD Forum 11 September 11, 2009 10:07
convergence vijay FLUENT 6 February 1, 2006 03:04
convergence vijay Main CFD Forum 1 January 30, 2006 13:13
too bad convergence Davoche Main CFD Forum 2 November 20, 2005 05:08
About convergence LQ CFX 3 June 2, 2005 23:43


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:24.