CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

Am I doing this right?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   March 18, 2009, 08:01
Default Am I doing this right?
  #1
Senior Member
 
Prapanch Nair
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Bangalore, India
Posts: 105
Rep Power: 7
prapanj is on a distinguished road
I am trying to solve the Euler equations for flow around a sphere. I have a small sphere, call is obstacle inside a big sphere, the domain. There are only two patches. obstacle, farfield. I am not able to solve a supersonic flow in this problem. Here are my settings :
I am using the sonicFoam solver.
fvSchemes:
ddt Euler; grad Gauss ; div gauss upwind; laplacian gauss corrected; interpolation linear ; sngrad corrected; fluxrequired yes;
fvsolution: has P, U, rho, e
Thermo and transport: mu = 0. I have used R and gamma - atmospheric values.

0:
p- obstacle-zerograd, farfield 1bar. internal field uniform 1 bar
U- obstacle- uniform(0 0 0), farfield- supersonicFreestream with pInf 1 bar, T 300, UInf (650 0 0 ), gamma 1.28 value (650 0 0)
T- obstacle zerograd, farfield inlet outlet with inletvalue and vlaue 300 k, internal field 300K.

I hope this explains all that I have set. Please suggest me what my mistake could be.

I have written an Euler solver myself that can solve this problem. Where I used farfield that uses the flux direction. Thank you
prapanj is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 19, 2009, 00:39
Default I tried with different pressure boundaries
  #2
Senior Member
 
Prapanch Nair
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Bangalore, India
Posts: 105
Rep Power: 7
prapanj is on a distinguished road
I am still trying on this. I changed the pressure boundary at the outer boundary to wave transmissive. Still blow up. I tried smaller time steps too. When I look at the intermediate results, there is velocity coming in from all directions. How is that possible, when I have set the inlet value to (650 0 0) ?
prapanj is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 19, 2009, 03:25
Default
  #3
Member
 
John Wang
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Singapore
Posts: 71
Rep Power: 7
cwang5 is on a distinguished road
Humm...I think it blew up because there is no "outflow" in your velocity setting. I have no clue how to fix it for supersonic inflow, though. If it's subsonic, I think you can just use inletoutlet (I'm not sure of the name) so the flow going out would go out instead of rebounding back. Just a quick guess, hope it'd help.
cwang5 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 20, 2009, 02:00
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Prapanch Nair
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Bangalore, India
Posts: 105
Rep Power: 7
prapanj is on a distinguished road
Thank you,

But I had tried the inletoutlet on the velocity field. let me keep trying though.
prapanj is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 23, 2009, 07:43
Default
  #5
New Member
 
adil mardionglu
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: waterford, Ireland
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 7
mardinoglu is on a distinguished road
Hi everone,

I need to ask a question about the grad of a scalarfield. I derived an analytical solution for volVectorField H and I need to calculate the f_w=\nabla(H^2).

I tried with volVectorField f_w=fvc::grad(H&H) but it does not match with analytical solution. Please can you tell me how I can calculate this in OpenFOAM.

regards

adil


Regards
mardinoglu is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 23, 2009, 08:47
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
dmoroian's Avatar
 
Dragos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 644
Rep Power: 10
dmoroian is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by prapanj View Post
I am trying to solve the Euler equations ... to solve a supersonic flow...
Here are my settings :
I am using the sonicFoam solver.
fvSchemes:
ddt Euler; grad Gauss ; div gauss upwind; laplacian gauss corrected; interpolation linear ; sngrad corrected; fluxrequired yes;
fvsolution: has P, U, rho, e
Thermo and transport: mu = 0. I have used R and gamma - atmospheric values.

0:
p- obstacle-zerograd, farfield 1bar. internal field uniform 1 bar
U- obstacle- uniform(0 0 0), farfield- supersonicFreestream with pInf 1 bar, T 300, UInf (650 0 0 ), gamma 1.28 value (650 0 0)
T- obstacle zerograd, farfield inlet outlet with inletvalue and vlaue 300 k, internal field 300K.
Hello Prapanj,
I think you should modify your boundary conditions. The "Theory of characteristics" tells that for a supersonic inlet there must be specified 4 out of 5 unknowns. The usual variables specified at the inlet: total temperature, total pressure and 2 velocity components; the rest will be computed from inside the domain (using zeroGradient for instance). At the supersonic outlet, only one unknown has to be specified, and it is usually the static pressure (for the rest you can use zeroGradient again).

I hope this will help you,
Dragos
dmoroian is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
euler, farfield, supersonic

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:33.