CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

This is a dilema, isn't it?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   May 8, 2009, 00:02
Default This is a dilema, isn't it?
  #1
Senior Member
 
lakeat's Avatar
 
Daniel WEI (老魏)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: South Bend, IN, USA
Posts: 688
Blog Entries: 9
Rep Power: 10
lakeat is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to lakeat
Hi Forum,
Suppose I have a flat plate case in wind tunnel, using RANS, it is required that the first cell height is around y+=30,
I have a dilemma here during refining the mesh near the boundary layer, on the one hand, modification of the simplegrading item will reduce the first cell height, on the other, if the average first cell height is below y+=30 (or y+=11, whatever), RANS will behave incorrectly.
So, how can I control the first cell height around a certain value, without breaking the wall-function guideline, when I try to refine the mesh?
__________________
~
Daniel WEI
-------------
NatHaz Modeling Laboratory
Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering & Earth Sciences
University of Notre Dame, USA
Email || My Personal CFD Blog
lakeat is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 8, 2009, 01:43
Default
  #2
Member
 
Marco Müller
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 94
Rep Power: 7
marico is on a distinguished road
Thats a problem of meshing. Which software do you use? For blockMesh you can change the grading... If you have enough resources take one of the lowRe-turbulence models, make a fine mesh and your y+ problem is solved...
marico is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 8, 2009, 01:55
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
lakeat's Avatar
 
Daniel WEI (老魏)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: South Bend, IN, USA
Posts: 688
Blog Entries: 9
Rep Power: 10
lakeat is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to lakeat
  1. I am using blockMesh, if I increase the grading ratio, the first cell height is inevitably reduced and lower than y+=30 (or y+=11), don't you think this is a dilemma?
  2. How to use low Re-turbulence models, using turbFoam? But, my case is a very high Re flow in wind tunnel? Is komegaSST able to do that?
  3. Theoretically, I see no problem in combining S-A model with a fine mesh (y+=1), but other models in OpenFOAM are all integrated with wall function, so applying them to a very fine mesh is not correct, isn't it?
__________________
~
Daniel WEI
-------------
NatHaz Modeling Laboratory
Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering & Earth Sciences
University of Notre Dame, USA
Email || My Personal CFD Blog

Last edited by lakeat; May 8, 2009 at 02:11.
lakeat is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 8, 2009, 05:33
Default
  #4
Member
 
Marco Müller
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 94
Rep Power: 7
marico is on a distinguished road
1. war and hunger is dilemma...
2. just specify in RASProperties file the model, you are in love with (incompressible). Low Re means locally near the wall low, NOT in free stream.
kOmegaSST is in standard release only with wall functions, but there is a version for incompressible LowRe in the wiki, if I remember rightly
3. Not all are with wall functions (USERS GUIDE)

Cheers
Marco
marico is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 8, 2009, 06:33
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
lakeat's Avatar
 
Daniel WEI (老魏)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: South Bend, IN, USA
Posts: 688
Blog Entries: 9
Rep Power: 10
lakeat is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to lakeat
Thank you so much, I do remember someone talked about the komegaSST version without wall Function, and I havn't found it yet.

in fact, UserGuide is not detailed in this issue, even the RANS model is not listed completely. But most of the released OpenFOAM RANS model are implemented with wall function. Seems their idea is high Re simulation without wall function is not practical.
__________________
~
Daniel WEI
-------------
NatHaz Modeling Laboratory
Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering & Earth Sciences
University of Notre Dame, USA
Email || My Personal CFD Blog
lakeat is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 8, 2009, 08:17
Default
  #6
Member
 
Marco Müller
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 94
Rep Power: 7
marico is on a distinguished road
I'm very new to CFD, but as far as I experienced, it IS really not practical for "real" geometries...
Look in src/turbulenceModels, I think all LowRe models are named ***LowRe.
For more:

http://openfoamwiki.net/index.php/Si...bulence_models
marico is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 8, 2009, 15:08
Default
  #7
Member
 
Paulo Alexandre Costa Rocha
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 71
Rep Power: 7
paulo is on a distinguished road
You can find some discussion on LowRe models in OF in this thread:

Bug in SpalartAllmaras

Regards,

Paulo Rocha
paulo is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 8, 2009, 21:54
Default
  #8
Senior Member
 
lakeat's Avatar
 
Daniel WEI (老魏)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: South Bend, IN, USA
Posts: 688
Blog Entries: 9
Rep Power: 10
lakeat is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to lakeat
That's exactly what I want, thank you Paulo. It is really a great discussion, I will follow that thread.
__________________
~
Daniel WEI
-------------
NatHaz Modeling Laboratory
Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering & Earth Sciences
University of Notre Dame, USA
Email || My Personal CFD Blog
lakeat is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Particle dilema Liza FLUENT 0 December 21, 2002 17:15


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 21:30.