
[Sponsors] 
August 1, 2010, 23:25 

#21  
Senior Member
Alberto Passalacqua
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ames, Iowa, United States
Posts: 1,907
Rep Power: 27 
Quote:
It is not easy to implement them in OF because it would mean a redesign of the data storage (DG and IP methods require more storage than standard FV), operators and such. Best,
__________________
Alberto Passalacqua GeekoCFD  A free distribution based on openSUSE 64 bit with CFD tools, including OpenFOAM. Available as in both physical and virtual formats. OpenQBMM  An opensource implementation of quadraturebased moment methods. To obtain more accurate answers, please specify the version of OpenFOAM you are using. 

August 1, 2010, 23:26 

#22  
Senior Member
Alberto Passalacqua
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ames, Iowa, United States
Posts: 1,907
Rep Power: 27 
Quote:
This has nothing to do with this thread. Why did you ask this here?
__________________
Alberto Passalacqua GeekoCFD  A free distribution based on openSUSE 64 bit with CFD tools, including OpenFOAM. Available as in both physical and virtual formats. OpenQBMM  An opensource implementation of quadraturebased moment methods. To obtain more accurate answers, please specify the version of OpenFOAM you are using. 

August 2, 2010, 12:15 
I am confused

#23 
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 46
Rep Power: 9 
Dear Alberto,
I ran the simulations according to your instructions. And here are the results: http://mech.sharif.edu/~mahdinia/Q.htm The spanwise instabilities in the QUICK case are called lobe and Cleft instabilities and should exist. The linear case has no lobe and cleft and the cubic case has unreal disturbances. There is a small point that I should mention. The maximum speed in our simulation is nearly the speed of the head of the current (foremost point of the heavy fluid), which is 0.1 m/s. Assuming the viscosity doesn't change for solution, it has a value of 10^6 m^/s of water. The horizontal length of the domain is 2 m. So in order to get Pe=2, one has to have 100000 cells in the horizontal direction (without refinement near the walls!). If we assume that we have a small number of cells, namely 80 cells in the spanwise and 80 cells in the vertical direction, then this give 640 million meshes. So I think no one would be able have to such mesh. Also there are articles published with 30 million cells for the exact same case: S. K. Ooi, G. Constantinescu, and L. Weber, “Numerical simulations of lockexchange compositional gravity current,” J. Fluid Mech. 635, 361 (2009). They use QUICK for convection in concentration equation but not in the momentum (they use central here). Currently my mesh is 800*80*80, with the refinement near walls so that y+=1 near all the walls. And my result match well both with experiments and the above work (as you know my mesh is coarser, so I can't see some small vortexes, but the agreement nevertheless is quite good). What do you think? For my case with Pe>2, should the QUICK method give more acceptable results since convection>>diffusion (Pe>>2) ? Sincerely, Maani. Last edited by mmahdinia; August 2, 2010 at 13:12. 

August 2, 2010, 23:50 

#24 
Senior Member
Alberto Passalacqua
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ames, Iowa, United States
Posts: 1,907
Rep Power: 27 
Hi,
the grid requirement is indeed Dx < 2e5 m in your case, which might be challenging. In such a case you are forced to use limiters or some highorder upwind scheme. If you are interested, you might investigate what happens with the limitedLinearV scheme for the convection, which is a linear scheme with a limiter to avoid oscillations where Pe > 2. It is not usually recommended for LES, but it might be competitive with QUICK, and it seems to be less diffusive than the linearUpwind (second order upwind like scheme). With this you should have a good view of the most frequently used schemes in OF, and find out which one gives the best results for your case. Best,
__________________
Alberto Passalacqua GeekoCFD  A free distribution based on openSUSE 64 bit with CFD tools, including OpenFOAM. Available as in both physical and virtual formats. OpenQBMM  An opensource implementation of quadraturebased moment methods. To obtain more accurate answers, please specify the version of OpenFOAM you are using. 

August 3, 2010, 01:28 
your phone

#25 
Senior Member
ata kamyabi
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Kerman
Posts: 322
Rep Power: 10 
Hi Mani
Your phone is switched off or the number is incorrect. Best regards Ata 

August 3, 2010, 13:16 
Dynamic Model

#26 
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 46
Rep Power: 9 
Dear Alberto,
I know that this might not be correlated to the topic, but I have a little question about dynamic LES itself. Since this model may become unstable, people use averaging. I have two questions: 1) In one of the posts you mentioned that to stabilize the code in the case of total inhomogeneity (all directions), one may clip nuEff to be nonzero. Is averaging necessary in this case? or is the averaging done on a small neighborhood of the particles? If yes how much should be the size of this neighborhood? I'd really appreciate it, if you could also mention an article about the clipping of nuEff (was it done before?) 2) Some people use temporal averaging. For example if C is the dyn. coeff., then: C(n+1)=(1eps)*c(n)+eps*c(n+1,calculated); where n is the time step an eps is nearly 10^3. Is this applicable for unsteady flows like mine? Sincerely, Maani 

August 4, 2010, 06:05 
Clipping

#27 
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 46
Rep Power: 9 
Hi,
Does anyone has a journal paper for "clipping" of effective viscosity such that (nuSGS+nu)>0 in dynamic LES mehod? Sincerely, Maani 

August 21, 2013, 14:59 
fourth order

#28 
Senior Member
ehsan
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 106
Rep Power: 9 
Dear all
I need to know the exact formula for fourth order discritization of P gradient in OpenFOAM. Could you be of any help? Best Regards Ehsan 

Thread Tools  
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
AUSM scheme ? Central Scheme  boling  Main CFD Forum  7  January 7, 2016 03:41 
Definition of limiter function for central dirrerencing scheme  sebastian_vogl  OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD  0  January 5, 2009 12:08 
CENTRAL STENCIL FOR WENO 4th ORDER SCHEMES  Alberto  Main CFD Forum  0  July 20, 2008 14:19 
4th and 5th Order TVD RungeKutta Methods  saygin  Main CFD Forum  2  January 30, 2006 12:45 
Discretisation scheme in CFX1st or 2nd order?  Pete  CFX  10  January 12, 2005 13:48 