|
[Sponsors] |
September 23, 2012, 20:42 |
Inlet patch problems
|
#1 |
Member
Hugh Ingham
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 35
Rep Power: 13 |
Hello Foamers,
I am having trouble getting a simulation to run and the main problem appears to be at my inlet. It is basically a converging diverging nozzle poking into a freestream and I am defining a inlet flow rate at the nozzle and a small coflow above the nozzle. I have attempted to use the flowrateinletvelocity condition but it appears to not be prescribing a velocity at the inlet, regardless of how high I set the mass flow rate. I have initialised my internal field velocity at 2m/s so all thats happening is the internal field is leaving the domain and being replaced by zero velocity air. Here is my mesh at the inlet: ICEMmesh.jpg I also used a fixed value velocity at the inlet to compare and found the following: For flowrateinletvelocity: - what is wrong with my inlet patch? It seems like it is not properly connected or something, like it is blocked. - why does mass flow rate BC cause no apparent inlet velocity to be defined? - why is the temperature not propagating (or doing so extremely slowly)? massflowrate50_U.jpg massflowrate50_T.jpg Fixed value velocity: - when fixed value velocity is defined, flow is developing, but way too slowly. 20 m/s inlet U should have travelled 4 metres (8 nozzle lengths) in 0.2 secs, however it has not even made the nozzle exit (travelled 10cm max) fixedvalue20_U.jpg fixedvalue20_T.jpg Please find attached the checkMesh log Create time Create polyMesh for time = 0 Time = 0 Mesh stats points: 617519 faces: 1789130 internal faces: 1727110 cells: 586040 boundary patches: 8 point zones: 0 face zones: 1 cell zones: 1 Overall number of cells of each type: hexahedra: 586040 prisms: 0 wedges: 0 pyramids: 0 tet wedges: 0 tetrahedra: 0 polyhedra: 0 Checking topology... Boundary definition OK. Cell to face addressing OK. Point usage OK. Upper triangular ordering OK. Face vertices OK. Number of regions: 1 (OK). Checking patch topology for multiply connected surfaces ... Patch Faces Points Surface topology CYCLIC_1 23366 23821 ok (non-closed singly connected) CYCLIC_2 23366 23821 ok (non-closed singly connected) FREESTREAM_BOTTOM 812 870 ok (non-closed singly connected) FREESTREAM_TOP 7784 8091 ok (non-closed singly connected) INLET 588 631 ok (non-closed singly connected) INLET_COFLOW 1372 1450 ok (non-closed singly connected) NOZZLEWALL 2772 2900 ok (non-closed singly connected) OUTLET 1960 2052 ok (non-closed singly connected) Checking geometry... Overall domain bounding box (-464.1161237 -5.05255153e-19 -1.064772188e-12) (1143 274.3200073 193.9735322) Mesh (non-empty, non-wedge) directions (1 1 1) Mesh (non-empty) directions (1 1 1) Boundary openness (-3.79177398008e-17 -5.85917462408e-14 4.36207997116e-14) OK. Max cell openness = 2.92805429189e-16 OK. Max aspect ratio = 11.1240642867 OK. Minumum face area = 0.330563016672. Maximum face area = 36.1242486469. Face area magnitudes OK. Min volume = 1.56100489244. Max volume = 165.81880705. Total volume = 36706377.576. Cell volumes OK. Mesh non-orthogonality Max: 48.8035890294 average: 8.6477627171 Non-orthogonality check OK. Face pyramids OK. Max skewness = 0.859011733412 OK. Coupled point location match (average 0) OK. Mesh OK. Does anyone have any ideas why it is acting so strangely at the inlet? Thanks |
|
Tags |
flowrateinletvelocity, inlet, inlet boundary condition |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cyclic Boundary Condition | Luiz Eduardo Bittencourt Sampaio (Sampaio) | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 36 | July 2, 2012 12:23 |
CFX problems with supersonic inlet condition - Inlet values in CFX-Post are wrong | jannnesss | CFX | 5 | February 25, 2011 16:24 |
Looking for inlet patch example | reimund | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 5 | June 10, 2008 18:25 |
[Gmsh] Import gmsh msh to Foam | adorean | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 24 | April 27, 2005 08:19 |
what the result is negatif pressure at inlet | chong chee nan | FLUENT | 0 | December 29, 2001 05:13 |