CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > OpenFOAM

bouyantBoussinesqSimpleFoam: specify mass flow in and out or use pressure bc

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   October 17, 2012, 01:49
Default bouyantBoussinesqSimpleFoam: specify mass flow in and out or use pressure bc
  #1
Senior Member
 
Julien de Charentenay
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 229
Rep Power: 9
julien.decharentenay is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to julien.decharentenay
Hi,

I am struggling with one aspect of buoyantBoussinesqSimpleFoam. The case I am trying to simple is reasonably simple: a room with one inlet, one outlet and some internal heat loads.

My initial thoughts were to use a velocity inlet for the inlet, and a pressure outlet for the outlet. When I run this scenario, the cumulative time-step continuity error keeps increasing, and when I look at the results in ParaView, the velocity at the outlet is too small (i.e the surface integral of the velocity at the inlet is larger by a factor of about 2 than the surface integral of the velocity at the outlet).

In regards to setup: p_rgh is set to buoyantPressure with a value of 0 for all surface except for the inlet (set to zeroGradient). p is set to calculate for all surfaces.

I tried to have a look at what others have done (on this forum and others) and found a couple of cases where the flow rate is specified at the inlet and outlet. The cases are: opencae.jp airConditionedRoom case and one generated by HVAC Gui for OpenFoam available on the extend project website (http://www.extend-project.de/user-forums/extend-groups/33-heating-ventilating-and-air-conditioning-hvac-group-forum/435-hvac-solver-with-buoyancy)

My impression is that my setup does not work as the boundary conditions for the pressure equation are not adequate (over-constrained). I am not entirely satisfied by the flow rate option as it could lead to an accumulation (or deprivation) of mass - although openFoam does check it.

Any opinion?

Kind regards,
Julien
__________________
---
Julien de Charentenay
julien.decharentenay is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:07.