|
[Sponsors] |
February 16, 2011, 23:28 |
Submarine with SimpleFoam
|
#1 |
New Member
Alexandre Rubel
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Launceston, Tasmania AUSTRALIA
Posts: 28
Rep Power: 15 |
Hi
I'm new with OpenFoam and I done a bit of CFD with CFX before. I doing a quite simple study about a submarine (without appendages) in OF 1.6. I'm using simpleFoam but for the moment I get quite bad results, and convergence problems. My inlet speed is 3.5 m/s and my mesh is around 6millions elements with a Y+ around 10. (this Mesh gives me very good results in CFX) The checkMesh is OK : Code:
Mesh stats points: 6238133 faces: 18602584 internal faces: 18491528 cells: 6182352 boundary patches: 4 point zones: 0 face zones: 0 cell zones: 0 Overall number of cells of each type: hexahedra: 6182352 prisms: 0 wedges: 0 pyramids: 0 tet wedges: 0 tetrahedra: 0 polyhedra: 0 Checking topology... Boundary definition OK. Point usage OK. Upper triangular ordering OK. Face vertices OK. Number of regions: 1 (OK). Checking patch topology for multiply connected surfaces ... Patch Faces Points Surface topology SURFACE_HULL 38368 38370 ok (closed singly connected) SURFACE_SIDE 46288 46464 ok (non-closed singly connected) SURFACE_OUTLET 17600 17689 ok (non-closed singly connected) SURFACE_INLET 8800 8889 ok (non-closed singly connected) Checking geometry... Overall domain bounding box (-7.696 -8.712 -8.712) (21.78 8.712 8.712) Mesh (non-empty, non-wedge) directions (1 1 1) Mesh (non-empty) directions (1 1 1) Boundary openness (-5.04721e-17 2.96585e-16 3.75431e-17) OK. Max cell openness = 7.73145e-15 OK. Max aspect ratio = 496.544 OK. Minumum face area = 1.83581e-08. Maximum face area = 0.376178. Face area magnitudes OK. Min volume = 6.63038e-12. Max volume = 0.102174. Total volume = 6329.87. Cell volumes OK. Mesh non-orthogonality Max: 61.2197 average: 9.26162 Non-orthogonality check OK. Face pyramids OK. Max skewness = 2.01934 OK. Mesh OK. I use potentialFoam then lunch the simpleFoam without turbulences and finally set the turbulences on. I set the following relaxation factors Code:
relaxationFactors { p 0.3; U 0.7; k 0.5; omega 0.5; R 0.7; nuTilda 0.7; } I got a lot of question with no answers : 1/ Am I using a good scheme (potential,turb off, turb on) to solve my problem ? 2/ Should I use WallFunction or fixedValue (0) for my hull BC (omega,k,nut) ? 3/ Should I use nNonOrthogonalCorrectors ? 4/ Is my relaxation factors good ? 5/ Do you have any idea to help me ? Tanks a lot Alex |
|
Tags |
komegasst, simplefoam, submarine, wallfunction |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Laminar simpleFoam and inviscid simpleFoam | herenger | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 7 | July 11, 2013 06:27 |
MPI Error - simpleFoam - Floating Point Exception | scott | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | April 13, 2012 16:34 |
simpleFoam ddt Euler ? | Mo-ITB | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | June 12, 2010 13:36 |
Naca0012 k-e mpirun gives fpe whereas simpleFoam not | Pierpaolo | OpenFOAM | 1 | May 8, 2010 03:08 |
Error running simpleFoam in parallel | skabilan | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | August 29, 2008 09:42 |