|June 2, 2011, 08:29||
SimpleFoam: Laminar vs. Turbulent Convergence
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Clemmons, NC
Posts: 76Rep Power: 7
I have been experimenting with some test cases for internally bounded flow of a control valve manifold. Based on the geometry of certain passages, I have assumed that under a certain flow rate the flow regime should be laminar throughout the volume and turbulent above that value.
Utilizing the same mesh for all cases, I have successfully run the turbulent model (k-epsilon) on a test case that should yield turbulent flow in most regions. I have also successfully run the laminar model on a test case that should yield laminar flow in most regions. When I attempt to use the turbulent solver on the same laminar test case I start to get convergence then the solution crashes on me. I was initially thinking that the turbulent solver could be applied towards a laminar case, and the k,e, & nut variables would have a negligible contribution to the result. Is this an erroneous assumption, or is there possibly some other issues going on?
Just before the solver crashes, the two cases have a 0.9 psi difference in results.
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Laminar field as initial state for turbulent two phase pipe flow||kjetil||OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD||3||July 21, 2009 09:15|
|Laminar Turbulence convergence||Paul S.||FLUENT||3||October 29, 2008 10:19|
|turbulent or laminar||Novice||FLUENT||1||October 8, 2008 09:39|
|Half laminar and turbulent model trying to solve||Andrew Clarke||FLUENT||5||May 19, 2008 13:40|
|turbulent & laminar result comparison||quarkz||Main CFD Forum||1||November 25, 2006 06:25|