CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Phoenics

MIGAL and library case E102

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   December 4, 2002, 05:28
Default MIGAL and library case E102
  #1
Olof Liungman
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hello!

I am looking for anyone who has any experience with MIGAL, preferably for transient, geophysical, stratified BFC-applications. I recently did some trial runs with MIGAL (PHOENICS 3.4), running through some of the examples (E001-E008) and tutorials (E100-E103) in the ecyclopaedia entry for MIGAL.

To my surprise E102, as well as some of the other tutorial runs, ran slower when using MIGAL, compared to using SIMPLEST. Is this to be expected? When is MIGAL a good choice and when is it not?

Thanks,

Olof
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 4, 2002, 14:44
Default Re: MIGAL and library case E102
  #2
Michel Ferry
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Dear Olof,

Each sweep with MIGAL is 5 to 10 time more expensive (CPU Time) than a SIMPLEST sweep. But the number of sweeps needed to reach a given residual level is much lower with MIGAL. Typically 20-30 sweeps for laminar flows and 60-80 sweeps for turbulent flows. The second point is that these numbers of sweeps are almost grid independent with MIGAL when they increase linearly with the number of cells with SIMPLEST. Hence the finest is your grid the better will be the speed up.

The tutorial E102 just exemplify the use of MIGAL. It is not a speed-up demo case.

I would like also encourage you to test the new MIGAL version delivered with PHOENICS 3.5. It is much more robut and provide some new features like a GMRES multi-grid peconditionned coulped solver. The PHOENICS users conference paper related to this new MIGAL version is downloadable from our web site: www.mfrdc.com

Best regards,

Michel Ferry
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 5, 2002, 08:17
Default Re: MIGAL and library case E102
  #3
Mark
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
As a side, Is MIGAL still an add on? Advice on how to get it might be good.

Through CHAM or direct to MFRDC?

Thanks in advance.

  Reply With Quote

Old   December 5, 2002, 08:38
Default Re: MIGAL and library case E102
  #4
Michel Ferry
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The PHOENICS implementation of MIGAL is still a PHOENICS option provided by CHAM and CHAM's local agents.

Best regards,

Michel Ferry
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 6, 2002, 12:15
Default Re: MIGAL and library case E102
  #5
Olof Liungman
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Dear Michel,

thanks for the explanation. I've downloaded your paper and will take a look at it.

As for my problem, me and my colleagues tend to be a little careless about achieving convergence within each time step. We usually get reasonable results for transient runs with only about 10 sweeps per time step, and neither sweeps nor iterations are stopped by reaching sufficiently low residuals. This inaccurate approach is justifiable, we think, as there are many other error due to inaccurate physics (when considering geophysical, natural flows) and the fact that we otherwise would be unable to perform the calculations within an acceptable time frame. We are already close to a one-to-one relation between simulated time and cpu-time...

Regards,

Olof
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Help with Library Case I107 leon mills Phoenics 3 October 28, 2004 19:08
Please help: Library case W771: No convergence Alex Costa Phoenics 5 August 3, 2004 18:54
Walking man Library case who doesn't walk??? tray Phoenics 0 June 3, 2004 19:49
MIGAL? George Bergantz Phoenics 2 May 22, 2001 08:48
some problem about the library case xyj Phoenics 1 March 8, 2001 10:42


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:24.