# cartesian Vs. Cylin-pol.

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 September 14, 2005, 04:56 cartesian Vs. Cylin-pol. #1 Arnie Guest   Posts: n/a hi, I am simulating jet flow in a geometry which is primarily cylindrical. To be precise, an axisymmetric jet flows from a tube contained concentrically inside a cylindrical enclosure. I have done it both in cartesian as well as cyl-pol. co-ordinates. the results however are coming out to be different. The reason I have assigned to it is as follows: Since, the jet axis is arbitrary i.e., not aligned with either x or y or z, and due to structured grid approach of phoenics,(there are no cell faces perp.to axis of jet) flow along jet axis is not simulated properly and a spread more than what is actually occuring is depicted. In Cyl-pol. co-ordinates, axial flow is simulated correctly, as jet axis is along Y axis for any jet orientation. But, will it be able to simulate transverse spread of the jet accurately enough. If you find my reasoning correct, please answer to my query. If you dont, please explain to me the reason for discrepancy that should occur while changing co-ordinate system as it is highly undesirable for any software. Thanks in advance Arnie

 September 28, 2005, 12:16 Re: cartesian Vs. Cylin-pol. #2 mick Guest   Posts: n/a There might be numerical smearing happening or maybe your cell apsect ratio is long in the main plume direction. But why cant you not align the flow with say the Z axes in cartesian when you can with cyl-polar?? Look to see if the two cases are converged fully, it may be that the cyl polar one has done better and this may be somewhat due to the possibility that with polar you have aligned the main plume direction to an axes. Run the cartesian again and align the pume direction to the z-axes, grind some convergence out and take a look, is the result appreciably different to your original run with inclined orientation. Also There are things like HOS which might help, see numerical diffusion.

 September 29, 2005, 04:51 Re: cartesian Vs. Cylin-pol. #3 Arnie Guest   Posts: n/a hi Mick, Thanks for pondering over my problem. Actually my problem involves obstructions in the path of the jet due to which I cant align as you said. Also, in cyl-pol syst., I have given jet axis to be along Y-direction so that I can chng the jet orientation easily. Changing jet orientation is very important in my case so as to study the efficiency of the jet. I would like to know what is HOS? Regards Arnie

 September 29, 2005, 06:47 Re: cartesian Vs. Cylin-pol. #4 mick Guest   Posts: n/a HOS is higher order schemes.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Emanuele Main CFD Forum 0 July 13, 2006 03:09 Thomas huang CFX 1 May 16, 2006 06:11 apple Main CFD Forum 0 April 9, 2006 09:09 Harish FLUENT 0 January 3, 2006 01:09 Abdul Main CFD Forum 2 April 16, 2001 04:29

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:58.