CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums

Search Results

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Showing results 1 to 12 of 12
Search took 0.00 seconds.
Search: Posts Made By: FMDenaro
Forum: Main CFD Forum September 21, 2015, 10:31
Replies: 23
Views: 3,536
Posted By FMDenaro
the residual must diminuish below such value

the residual must diminuish below such value
Forum: Main CFD Forum September 21, 2015, 08:53
Replies: 23
Views: 3,536
Posted By FMDenaro
difference bewteen two iterations is not...

difference bewteen two iterations is not meaningful for the real convergence
Forum: Main CFD Forum September 21, 2015, 05:44
Replies: 23
Views: 3,536
Posted By FMDenaro
in the residual you must consider any discrete...

in the residual you must consider any discrete term you used in the computation... in symbolic term, said vn the solution at step n and A the discrete operators containing all fluxes (bounded or...
Forum: Main CFD Forum September 21, 2015, 04:36
Replies: 23
Views: 3,536
Posted By FMDenaro
the residual is computed for the discrete...

the residual is computed for the discrete equation you really want to satisfy...if you linearized, this discrete equation must provide a vanishing residual. You cannot use the solution vector to...
Forum: Main CFD Forum September 15, 2015, 15:06
Replies: 23
Views: 3,536
Posted By FMDenaro
plot the velcoity at some station and superimpose...

plot the velcoity at some station and superimpose the parabolic law...anyway, do you have ensured to have a suffient lenght do let the flow develop?
Forum: Main CFD Forum September 15, 2015, 14:04
Replies: 23
Views: 3,536
Posted By FMDenaro
you found the bug, the results seems physically...

you found the bug, the results seems physically reasonable now...you can compare with the analytical Blasius solution for a flat plane...then check that after some height a fully parabolic velocity...
Forum: Main CFD Forum September 11, 2015, 07:01
Replies: 23
Views: 3,536
Posted By FMDenaro
you have a bug in the code ... at Re=1 you should...

you have a bug in the code ... at Re=1 you should see the two spatially evolving boundary layers
Forum: Main CFD Forum September 10, 2015, 10:46
Replies: 23
Views: 3,536
Posted By FMDenaro
please, post directly the image... however, there...

please, post directly the image... however, there is for sure something wrong in the code...check the BC.s after the correction, are they no-slip conditions?
Forum: Main CFD Forum September 10, 2015, 10:01
Replies: 23
Views: 3,536
Posted By FMDenaro
At Re=1 you should see the viscous parablic...

At Re=1 you should see the viscous parablic profile...something is wrong...are you sure to have reached the steady state?
Forum: Main CFD Forum September 10, 2015, 08:28
Replies: 23
Views: 3,536
Posted By FMDenaro
Try for Re=1

Try for Re=1
Forum: Main CFD Forum September 10, 2015, 07:15
Replies: 23
Views: 3,536
Posted By FMDenaro
at such a Re number you cannot see a developed...

at such a Re number you cannot see a developed viscous profile........you have to reduce the Re number of some order of magnutude
Forum: Main CFD Forum September 10, 2015, 06:28
Replies: 23
Views: 3,536
Posted By FMDenaro
yes, provided that the lengh of the plate is...

yes, provided that the lengh of the plate is sufficient, you should get a parobolic velocity profile. What Re number do you set?
Showing results 1 to 12 of 12

 
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:35.