Forum: FLUENT
June 21, 2011, 03:14
|
Replies: 25
Views: 4,422
particle_tracking
In case of Brownian force it is important to compare the time step with the relaxation time, because the distribution from which we select the random force is different in the two cases (dt<<tau and...
|
Forum: FLUENT
February 4, 2011, 10:55
|
Replies: 25
Views: 4,422
|
Forum: FLUENT
February 4, 2011, 10:53
|
Replies: 25
Views: 4,422
Then you should contact FLUENT (ANSYS) helpdesk...
Then you should contact FLUENT (ANSYS) helpdesk and report the bug.
In an earlier version (6.1.18 I think) there was a bug like if the particle diameter was less than 0.01 micron than it evaporated....
|
Forum: FLUENT
February 4, 2011, 10:05
|
Replies: 25
Views: 4,422
|
Forum: FLUENT
February 4, 2011, 09:08
|
Replies: 25
Views: 4,422
|
Forum: FLUENT
February 4, 2011, 08:02
|
Replies: 25
Views: 4,422
|
Forum: FLUENT
February 4, 2011, 07:46
|
Replies: 25
Views: 4,422
I perfectly agree with you! Actually, this was...
I perfectly agree with you! Actually, this was the reason (relaxation times) why I wanted to implement my own Brownian motion UDF. I had long discussions with developers, but they simply did not...
|
Forum: FLUENT
February 4, 2011, 03:34
|
Replies: 25
Views: 4,422
tracking
I am not sure wether I understand it well, but as far as I know the only way to influence particle trajectory is through the setable parameters and body forces, but not using another numerical...
|
Forum: FLUENT
February 3, 2011, 14:08
|
Replies: 25
Views: 4,422
|