|
[Sponsors] |
Publication quality figures from Star-ccm+ analyses? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
September 3, 2013, 11:56 |
Publication quality figures from Star-ccm+ analyses?
|
#1 |
New Member
Nick
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 14 |
Hi all,
I was wondering if any of you had some tips about how to produce good quality figures and images from Star-ccm+? At the moment I'm having some trouble outputting images of a 2D simulation. The lines for the outline of the shape are jaggedy/pixelly, and don't really look good enough. Changing the line width, image format and resolution don't seem to help matters; if anything, the lower resolution images actually look better. Any ideas? I'm also getting quite a lot of aliasing in my images when I have streamlines with velocity contours. An example of this is seen in the image attached. I really need sharper, smoother, smarter images than this because they're for my thesis. Do I need to use Paraview or tecPlot instead? I'd really like to hear your views on this and any suggested settings would be very helpful! Thanks! Nick |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
problem when imported geometry from 3D CAD to star ccm, | TAREK GANAT | STAR-CCM+ | 1 | May 21, 2013 22:15 |
[Commercial meshers] Using starToFoam | clo | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 33 | September 26, 2012 04:04 |
[Other] StarToFoam error | Kart | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 1 | February 4, 2010 04:38 |
Star CCM - Problem with image hardcopy quality | James | Siemens | 2 | March 14, 2007 02:36 |
[Commercial meshers] Trimmed cell and embedded refinement mesh conversion issues | michele | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | July 15, 2005 04:15 |