|
[Sponsors] |
April 13, 2015, 22:10 |
Setup for implicit LES
|
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 68
Rep Power: 13 |
Hi. As I understand, implicit LES means no SGS model is used. If I use WALE, I have to set the constant Cw=0 in starccm+. I wonder what should I do with the constant Ct, which is related to turbulent time scale. Should I set Ct=0 as well for implicit LES? Thanks a lot in advance.
|
|
April 14, 2015, 05:00 |
|
#2 |
Member
DaveyBaby
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 46
Rep Power: 12 |
I think implicit generally refers to the time-marching scheme and not the subgrid scale models?
Cw=0.544 by default, an optimised parameter. Why do you have to set Cw=0 please? Is this to help the turbulence to develop initially or something? Sorry if my answer is actually a question, I am intrigued! I have initialised all my LES successfully without doing this, is it to save time? |
|
November 28, 2016, 13:06 |
|
#3 | |
Member
|
Quote:
No here, implicit Les means, having no Subgrid-scale model for turbulence. Moreover, in the MILES approach, the numerical error of the schemes are used as SGS models by purpose. A paper on the topic using OpenFOAM: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ fld.925 Regards, Reza |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
OpenFOAM LES capability questions | siw | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | January 6, 2015 08:50 |
[ICEM] Hexa mesh, curve mesh setup, bunching law | Anorky | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 4 | November 12, 2014 00:27 |
setup problems - LES pipe flow with cyclic BC (1) and direct mapped inlet (2) | florian_krause | OpenFOAM | 22 | June 13, 2013 21:25 |
Turbulence dampening due to magnetic field in LES and RAS | eelcovv | OpenFOAM | 0 | June 8, 2010 11:35 |
Some Questions about LES. | Bin Li | Main CFD Forum | 2 | February 20, 2004 09:58 |