 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
[Sponsors] | ||||
|
|
January 26, 2015, 23:53
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
varghese mathew
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: India
Posts: 32
Rep Power: 11  |
ok thanks a lot .expecting that there would be some options for 3d flutter analysis also .but all together the software is very good
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 28, 2015, 02:56
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
varghese mathew
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: India
Posts: 32
Rep Power: 11 |
i ran the beam problem for latest su2 3.2.7 .it seems like it doesnot provide displacement as output
TITLE = "Visualization of the surface solution" VARIABLES = "x","y","Conservative_1","Conservative_2", "Von_Mises_Stress", "Flow_Pressure" ZONE NODES= 436, ELEMENTS= 436, DATAPACKING=POINT, ZONETYPE=FELINESEG 0.000000e+00 -1.000000e-02 4.857543e-04 -1.277594e-02 1.003697e+06 0.000000e+00 1.758794e-03 -1.000000e-02 4.857510e-04 -1.269056e-02 9.932117e+05 0.000000e+00 3.517588e-03 -1.000000e-02 4.346568e-04 -1.277593e-02 1.011840e+06 0.000000e+00 5.276382e-03 -1.000000e-02 4.857477e-04 -1.260519e-02 1.003343e+06 0.000000e+00 8.793970e-03 -1.000000e-02 3.835593e-04 -1.277593e-02 1.020270e+06 0.000000e+00 1.055276e-02 -1.000000e-02 4.857441e-04 -1.251981e-02 1.045352e+06 0.000000e+00 1.582915e-02 -1.000000e-02 3.324621e-04 -1.277592e-02 1.012095e+06 0.000000e+00 1.758794e-02 -1.000000e-02 4.857397e-04 -1.243443e-02 1.127047e+06 0.000000e+00 2.462312e-02 -1.000000e-02 2.813652e-04 -1.277592e-02 9.821737e+05 0.000000e+00 2.638191e-02 -1.000000e-02 4.857339e-04 -1.234905e-02 1.257821e+06 0.000000e+00 3.517588e-02 -1.000000e-02 2.302688e-04 -1.277592e-02 9.304990e+05 0.000000e+00 3.693467e-02 -1.000000e-02 4.857263e-04 -1.226367e-02 1.444182e+06 0.000000e+00 4.748744e-02 -1.000000e-02 1.791727e-04 -1.277591e-02 8.594749e+05 0.000000e+00 4.924623e-02 -1.000000e-02 4.857166e-04 -1.217828e-02 1.688509e+06 0.000000e+00 6.155779e-02 -1.000000e-02 1.280770e-04 -1.277591e-02 7.727136e+05 0.000000e+00 6.331658e-02 -1.000000e-02 4.857042e-04 -1.209290e-02 1.990227e+06 0.000000e+00 7.738693e-02 -1.000000e-02 7.698149e-05 -1.277590e-02 6.744497e+05 0.000000e+00 7.914573e-02 -1.000000e-02 4.856890e-04 -1.200752e-02 2.347512e+06 0.000000e+00 9.497487e-02 -1.000000e-02 2.588617e-05 -1.277590e-02 5.692429e+05 0.000000e+00 9.673367e-02 -1.000000e-02 4.856704e-04 -1.192214e-02 2.758377e+06 0.000000e+00 1.143216e-01 -1.000000e-02 -2.520909e-05 -1.277590e-02 4.618148e+05 0.000000e+00 1.160804e-01 -1.000000e-02 4.856481e-04 -1.183676e-02 3.221110e+06 0.000000e+00 1.354271e-01 -1.000000e-02 -7.630441e-05 -1.277590e-02 3.569483e+05 0.000000e+00 1.371859e-01 -1.000000e-02 4.856217e-04 -1.175138e-02 3.734370e+06 0.000000e+00 1.582915e-01 -1.000000e-02 -1.273999e-04 -1.277590e-02 2.594146e+05 0.000000e+00 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| how can we get flutter speed from 2way fsi?? | siddu.pk | ANSYS | 2 | January 22, 2014 22:35 |
| Does Fluid Structure Coupling between CFD-FEM solves can predict Flutter Speed? | Engr.RZA | Main CFD Forum | 1 | December 10, 2012 18:45 |
| FSI and flutter | pop | CFX | 11 | July 26, 2011 11:48 |
| Two questions concerning flutter? | lakeat | Main CFD Forum | 3 | April 7, 2011 10:21 |
| Vortex shedding and aeroelastic flutter question | Freeman | FLUENT | 2 | March 20, 2009 07:19 |
Hybrid Mode
