# Talk:Turbulence free-stream boundary conditions

### From CFD-Wiki

m (Talk:Turbulence boundary conditions moved to Talk:Turbulence free-stream boundary conditions) |
|||

(2 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||

Line 1: | Line 1: | ||

Someone should double check the formulas here! It is easy to make a misstake and I typed them in from my head after midnight... :-) --[[User:Jola|Jola]] 17:09, 18 April 2006 (MDT) | Someone should double check the formulas here! It is easy to make a misstake and I typed them in from my head after midnight... :-) --[[User:Jola|Jola]] 17:09, 18 April 2006 (MDT) | ||

+ | |||

+ | I tried to modify the omega equation, but for some reason it is not created. In the original text C_\mu was forgotten. | ||

+ | - Timo | ||

+ | |||

+ | We had a permission error on a directory that has now been fixed. I do not think that the correction you did is correct though. C_mu should not be in that formula I think. What reference did you have that said C_mu should be there? We went through these formulas in detail when we wrote the [http://www.cfd-online.com/Tools/turbulence.php turbulence properties] tool. --[[User:Peter|Peter]] 11:23, 6 February 2013 (MST) | ||

+ | |||

+ | Ok, seemed to be my bad. The formula is correct indeed. I'll try to be more careful next time and double check my references. - Timo |

## Latest revision as of 07:01, 7 February 2013

Someone should double check the formulas here! It is easy to make a misstake and I typed them in from my head after midnight... :-) --Jola 17:09, 18 April 2006 (MDT)

I tried to modify the omega equation, but for some reason it is not created. In the original text C_\mu was forgotten. - Timo

We had a permission error on a directory that has now been fixed. I do not think that the correction you did is correct though. C_mu should not be in that formula I think. What reference did you have that said C_mu should be there? We went through these formulas in detail when we wrote the turbulence properties tool. --Peter 11:23, 6 February 2013 (MST)

Ok, seemed to be my bad. The formula is correct indeed. I'll try to be more careful next time and double check my references. - Timo