|
[Sponsors] |
October 13, 2015, 05:12 |
Low Quality Mesh
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Aja
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 496
Rep Power: 14 |
Hi,
According to specified parts in the following figure, mesh has not good quality. why? Please check Gambit file, Gambit file is as follows: http://www.4shared.com/zip/rDI--ohyba/BBBB.html Thanks for allocating your time. Best. Aja |
|
October 13, 2015, 05:31 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
how did you check your grid?
why are you writing that those areas gives you quality issue?
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
October 13, 2015, 06:15 |
|
#3 | ||
Senior Member
Aja
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 496
Rep Power: 14 |
Hi,
Quote:
Quote:
Is it possible that mesh became better in these areas? Thanks. Best. Aja |
|||
October 13, 2015, 06:54 |
|
#4 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
there is a tool for checking the mesh quality: https://www.sharcnet.ca/Software/Gam....htm#gc_exmesh
If I set the skewsize criterion at 0.8 , then your worst quality cells are here: Untitled.png Nevertheless I would run on this grid, because worst skewsize is 0.9, which should be acceptable. You can still improve your mesh if you are not satisfied with your results
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
October 13, 2015, 08:20 |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
Aja
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 496
Rep Power: 14 |
Really thanks max,
The mentioned two side(for example, mesh of volumes 40 and 109) should be same in term of mesh because of geometric symmetry, but these are not same. why? I tried to again mesh these volumes, but it is not corrected. In fact, these volumes will not be same in term of mesh!!! why? I am grateful that guide me more about this case. Thanks. Best. Aja |
|
October 13, 2015, 08:38 |
|
#6 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
if you want exactly the same mesh on both volumes, then you need to link them
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
October 13, 2015, 09:35 |
|
#7 |
Senior Member
Aja
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 496
Rep Power: 14 |
||
October 13, 2015, 09:46 |
|
#8 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
you need to delete all the meshes first
then link also the surfaces PS: Check your BL (it surrounds not completely your foil)
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[snappyHexMesh] No layers in a small gap | bobburnquist | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 6 | August 26, 2015 09:38 |
[Other] Mesh quality | vitorspadetoventurin | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 0 | November 28, 2014 18:27 |
[ICEM] Tetra mesh quality before and after prism layer | Chander | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 0 | December 25, 2011 22:04 |
Icemcfd 11: Loss of mesh from surface mesh option? | Joe | CFX | 2 | March 26, 2007 18:10 |
How to control Minximum mesh space? | hung | FLUENT | 7 | April 18, 2005 09:38 |