CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS

Extension with BEAM188 conflicts with other contacts

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   September 23, 2015, 06:03
Default Extension with BEAM188 conflicts with other contacts
  #1
New Member
 
andrea
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
AnBil is on a distinguished road
Hi all!

I am TOTALLY new to Ansys Mechanical APDL, so my question might sound quite basic, anyway, Iīm totally stacked right now and I havenīt found much information in the literature available.

My simplified geometry (which intends to be applied in a bigger model)consists on a squared plate with a screw in the middle of it, where I apply a displacement. This plate represents a sandwich honeycomb panel, so it is composed of a middle core (solid), and two surfaces (top and bottom from it), all "sticked" with contacts.

I am trying to simplify this geometry and I am currently trying to model the screw with a Beam188 element. My intention is that this is done automatically, so I am trying to develop an extension for that. As an initial point, I have introduced the coordinates where the Beam would be located manually. This is the input APDL part that I have written so far:

*GET,n_el,ELEM,0,num,max
*GET,mat1, ELEM,n_el,ATTR,MAT


!Nodes
n, 1, -0.1, 0.001, -0.1
n, 2, -0.1, 0.02, -0.1
n, 3, -0.2, 0.02, -0.1

propRadius=0.001
propK=0.5
l=0.01

!Beam type
et,100,beam188
SECTYPE, 4, BEAM,CSOLID, 1, 0
SECOFFSET, CENT
SECDATA, propRadius, 8, 2
KEYOPT, 100, 1, 0
KEYOPT, 100, 3, 2
KEYOPT, 100, 9, 0

!Material properties
mp, ex, 16, 1592
mp, ey, 16, 1592
mp, ez, 16, 1592
mp, nuxy, 16, 0.3

!Element connection and orientation
en, 100, 1, 2, 3


!Displacement boundary conditions
d, 1, ux, 0
d, 1, uy, 0
d, 1, uz, 0
d, 1, rotx, 0
d, 1, roty, 0
d, 1, rotz, 0

!Applied force
f, 2, fy, F
eplot
fini

/solu

When I solve in Ansys Mechanical, I obtaine the following error in the file.err:

"The behavior of target elements specified by real constant 4 are not consistent. Some of elements belong to a rigid surface, while others belong to a deformable surface."

Real constant 4 is referred to the contact between the core and bottom surface of the honeycomb panel. I havenīt been able to find any solution or any clear reason to know why this happens. As far as I have checked, Beam 188 is a flexible beam and the contacts between the surfaces have also been set as flexible. For sure I am missing something which is crucial in the model, but due to my lack of experience I am not able to solve it. If anyone could throw some light, I would be really thankful.

Greetings,

AnBil
AnBil is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[OpenFOAM] Xlib: extension "GLX" missing on display goldbeard ParaView 5 March 24, 2013 13:12
errors when installing openfoam2.1 on ubuntu12.o4 hewei OpenFOAM Installation 5 May 29, 2012 07:43
Harmonic extension lingdeer Main CFD Forum 0 February 20, 2012 14:56
[OpenFOAM] Saving ParaFoam views and case sail ParaView 9 November 25, 2011 15:46
[OpenFOAM] Xwindows crash with paraview save srinath ParaView 1 October 15, 2008 09:37


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 23:57.