|May 13, 2009, 19:05||
CFX 12 in WB 2.0 - Your thoughts?
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 22Rep Power: 8
I think CFX 12 (standalone) looks and feels like it has some major improvements. I am happy there, and it is working like 11 in my case.
I am not keen on the CFX file structure in the new Workbench 2.0, however. Take a look; WB is not saving things where you think and the whole flow just seems to be a mess. For example, in CFX-pre (in WB 2.0) one cannot manually write the .def file anymore (I am missing the gear icon thing)! This has caused me some major issues which are too lengthy to get into here.
Is anybody else having second thoughts on this 2.0 paradigm? My excitement level on 2.0 has gone from high to nil in almost 24 hours.
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Pros and Cons for CFX, CFdesign, COMSOL||Val||Main CFD Forum||3||June 10, 2011 02:20|
|Importing solutions in CFX.||Alphonso||CFX||1||August 1, 2008 14:01|
|PhD using CFX||Rui||CFX||9||May 28, 2007 05:59|
|CFX 10's solutions differ from CFX 5.7's||Atit Koonsrisuk||CFX||4||July 26, 2006 11:59|
|CFX 4.4 installation problem||Pandu Sattvika||CFX||1||December 1, 2001 05:07|