CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

Question about heat transfer simulation convergence

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree2Likes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   May 22, 2013, 05:55
Default
  #21
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,703
Rep Power: 143
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
FAQ: http://www.cfd-online.com/Wiki/Ansys...gence_criteria
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 22, 2013, 06:07
Default
  #22
Member
 
Ben B. Huang
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 54
Rep Power: 13
hwangpo is on a distinguished road
Thanks for your reply
hwangpo is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 13, 2017, 04:33
Default Transient heat transfer simulation - convergence
  #23
Member
 
VB
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 35
Rep Power: 9
Vishnu_bharathi is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghorrocks View Post
Yes, the solid time scale factor is only applicable to steady state runs. In transient runs you have to model it with the physical time step the same in both regions.

Shoushou:
I mean set a solid time scale factor in the range of 100-1000.

You do not need to change the time step during a run. You can start it with this high factor.

For CHT simulations I recommend using the residuals AND imbalances as convergence tolerances. Do a sensitivity study to check your settings are OK and then use that setting on all your runs.

Setting time step size: Just try it out and see if it works. It is goes slow then make it bigger, If it diverges then make it smaller.
I write in this thread as it is more related in what I am doing. I am doing a transient heat transfer simulation. I have the simulation run as charging and discharging cycles. regarding solver convergence: I checked residuals and Imblances in fluid and solid region. The residual graph looks good until 350(iterations) and after that it started increasing as shown.. Why is this?

The global imblances are with in 1% . I checked the yplus value near the fluid and solid interface and it is 30+ for 70% of the area and 80+ for 30% of the area. I use SST model.

What can be the reason for this residual graph shoot up after 350 iterations?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg residual graph.JPG (131.3 KB, 24 views)
File Type: jpg imblances.JPG (50.7 KB, 16 views)
Vishnu_bharathi is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 13, 2017, 07:15
Default
  #24
Senior Member
 
JuPa's Avatar
 
Mr CFD
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Britain
Posts: 361
Rep Power: 14
JuPa is on a distinguished road
Without knowing what you're simulating it's hard to give a proper answer.

It could be due to a poor mesh, poor choice of model, both, or something else completely.

To me it might look like the simulation is resolving some evolving flow physics (maybe vorticies which grow as a function of time?).

Start a new thread and give a detailed description of what you're doing.

Also I'm sure Ghorrocks will be around to tell you to read the FAQ - so do that too.
JuPa is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 13, 2017, 17:12
Default
  #25
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,703
Rep Power: 143
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
Sadly, I don't think an FAQ covers this one

I agree with Mr CFD's comments: First check for numerical problems (mesh, models), and if they look OK check for transient flow starting up, such as vortex shedding or gross flow instabilities.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 14, 2017, 04:35
Default
  #26
Member
 
VB
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 35
Rep Power: 9
Vishnu_bharathi is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by JuPa View Post
Without knowing what you're simulating it's hard to give a proper answer.

It could be due to a poor mesh, poor choice of model, both, or something else completely.

To me it might look like the simulation is resolving some evolving flow physics (maybe vorticies which grow as a function of time?).

Start a new thread and give a detailed description of what you're doing.

Also I'm sure Ghorrocks will be around to tell you to read the FAQ - so do that too.
Thank you. I m starting a new thread
Vishnu_bharathi is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 14, 2017, 04:37
Default
  #27
Member
 
VB
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 35
Rep Power: 9
Vishnu_bharathi is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghorrocks View Post
Sadly, I don't think an FAQ covers this one

I agree with Mr CFD's comments: First check for numerical problems (mesh, models), and if they look OK check for transient flow starting up, such as vortex shedding or gross flow instabilities.
okay,Ghorrocks. I ll try to create new thread with more details on this regard.
Vishnu_bharathi is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 13, 2021, 14:43
Question Convergence Issues-CHT for Turbomachinery
  #28
New Member
 
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 5
gikamc is on a distinguished road
Hello! Thank you all for this useful thread, it helps a lot in CHT related topics.



I am trying to simulate a multistage axial turbine throw CFX to account later for the temperature field on turbine blades by thermal analysis.



To succeed more acqurate results i implemented in my model Conjugate Heat Transfer with a loose couple (different mesh between fluid region (TurboGrid) and solid region (Ansys Meshing) through CFX.



When i applied CFX to only the second rotor stage (to check if it works fine with my settings (interfaces etc.)) it results with good convergence both from residuals side and global imbalance as well.



However, when i tried to add mesh for another stage then RMS-T Energy for the previous stage is diverging like in the attached image.


Timescale for fluid domain is set as 1/omega through an expression (as suggested by CFX-manual)



I used different Timescales for the solid domains like 1000, 100, 10 and 1s but it tends to give similar results in all cases.


I would be grateful if you could make me aware of what is the possible cause of that.



Again, Thank you!


Residuals' Plots:

https://ibb.co/Btk2PMn
https://ibb.co/zh2sPQy
https://ibb.co/PjrqPpY
gikamc is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Transient heat transfer simulation with variable heat source rdr CFX 3 July 31, 2015 04:33
Question about fluid-solid conduction heat transfer contact resistance Anna Tian Main CFD Forum 1 May 7, 2013 10:39
Heat Transfer mechanisms tafaugl CFX 1 November 7, 2012 18:46
increasing mesh quality is leading to poor convergence tippo CFX 2 May 5, 2009 10:55
Heat transfer convergence problem kam FLUENT 0 February 26, 2007 12:32


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:44.