|
[Sponsors] |
CFX Post -cavitation modelling- different puressures question |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
June 17, 2013, 09:52 |
CFX Post -cavitation modelling- different puressures question
|
#1 |
Member
Sebastian
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 13 |
Hello,
I have a little problem regarding the post processing of my cavitating simulation flow. While being in the post processer I cant use the Variables:" Pressure, Absolute Pressure and Total Pressure" with the local range. The only thing that works for planes contour plots and stuff is the solver pressure. What I know about the solver pressure is, that its not clipped like the others to either my reference pressure or the saturation pressure. I am not really sure what the most accurate in terms of "reality". I know that negativ pressures can happen in the flow but I get around -9 bar what seems pretty big to me. Furthermore I am not quite sure about the pressure level information tab in the solver controle. At the moment I have a reference Pressure of 0 bar and static pressure of 1 bar. Since I dont have any inlet or boundary conditions the CFX manual recommends that I take the pressure level information aswell. I sat the point of the information right where the cavitation happens and a relative pressure of 0. Is this correct? Thanks in advance Badi |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How to post question on forum? | bubuchacha | Site Help, Feedback & Discussions | 3 | May 11, 2020 10:30 |
CFX Post Viewing Question (n00b) | ajhunte | CFX | 1 | March 16, 2013 18:36 |
CFX Post add user surface | Zigainer | CFX | 0 | October 2, 2012 08:57 |
chart for transiente simulation - CFX Post | rogbrito | CFX | 0 | June 22, 2009 12:12 |
density gradients in CFX post | prabhu | CFX | 1 | June 12, 2006 06:47 |