CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

LES quality assessement

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   September 4, 2013, 15:12
Default LES quality assessement
  #1
New Member
 
mira
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 6
mirabella is on a distinguished road
Hello everybody!

How can I get the resolved turbulent kinetic energy and the subgrid turbulent kinetic energy for an LES simulation with CFD-Post? I want to compare the resolved part with the modeled one, to assess the quality of LES calculated with CFX

nice greetings
mirabella is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 4, 2013, 17:53
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,662
Rep Power: 84
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
Which LES model are you using?

To get the resolved turbulent kinetic energy you need to do some mathematics on your results file. You need to split the velocity field into a mean flow and turbulent component. You can do that by time averaging, spatial averaging or ensemble averaging (for a periodic flow like an IC engine). Once you have the average you can evaluate the resolved turbulent component.
ghorrocks is online now   Reply With Quote

Old   September 5, 2013, 07:30
Default
  #3
New Member
 
mira
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 6
mirabella is on a distinguished road
Actually, I am using the Smagorinsky model.
Lead these ways of averaging to same results?
For time avergaing, shall I calculate an area averaged turbulent kinetic energy for each transient file, then calculate the mean values over time?
Do you know, how can I get that with CFD-POST?
Thank you!
mirabella is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 5, 2013, 08:21
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,662
Rep Power: 84
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
It is a bit tricky with the Smagorinsky model, it is a dissipative model with no explicit sub grid kinetic energy component. If you hunt through the turbulence modelling textbooks you might find something but I cannot recall off the top of my head what it is.

No, the three methods of averging I mentioned do not usually lead to the same results. That would be far too simple .

No, do not do a area averaged k then time averge that. That would be some weirdo space and time average. The literature does one or the other and that makes sense to me.

To do time averaging you have to activate the time averaging options in the CFX-Pre output file tab. To do spatial averaging you can do that on a results file in post-processing - but it is not simple, you have to define a averaging length scale and there are no simple functions in CFX I know of to do that.
ghorrocks is online now   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Quality assessment of LES by the subgrid viscosity ratio shuangqingx Main CFD Forum 13 August 21, 2013 19:53
Turbulence dampening due to magnetic field in LES and RAS eelcovv OpenFOAM 0 June 8, 2010 11:35
[ICEM] Hex refinement negative quality afterwards Anorky ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 8 March 22, 2010 04:25
Some Questions about LES. Bin Li Main CFD Forum 2 February 20, 2004 10:58
LES & grid quality Ales Skotak Main CFD Forum 1 July 23, 1999 09:46


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:20.