|
[Sponsors] |
Ansys Turbulent Flat Plate: reproducing results published by NASA |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
December 6, 2015, 17:07 |
|
#21 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,710
Rep Power: 143 |
You are using first order turbulence numerics and upwind advection. You are never going to get very accurate results with those settings. The advection should be hydrid (with blend factor of close to 1.0) or high res. You should also consider high order turbulence numerics.
|
|
December 6, 2015, 18:20 |
|
#22 | |
Senior Member
Sultan Islam
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Canada
Posts: 137
Rep Power: 10 |
Quote:
Boundary conditions seem to be correct. Here are the pictures Front Side mesh grid mesh grid front side.jpg Back Side mesh grid mesh grid back side.jpg Mesh setting mesh setting.jpg BC BC Conditions.jpg Its running right now, even on a 8 core 16 thread with 100% utilization a run still takes 20 mins, will check back with results. Any other tips? Thank you so far. |
||
December 6, 2015, 18:49 |
|
#23 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,710
Rep Power: 143 |
Here's a tip:
CFX does not run effectively on virtual cores. If you have 8 physical cores then do not run more than 8 processes. |
|
December 7, 2015, 00:16 |
|
#24 |
Senior Member
Sultan Islam
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Canada
Posts: 137
Rep Power: 10 |
Nice so now I am getting nice results but for some reason the reynolds number I am getting is less than what the max reynolds number is. My graph ends at 6x10e6 where I should be getting max re as 2.5x10e7.
|
|
December 7, 2015, 05:22 |
|
#25 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,710
Rep Power: 143 |
How are you calculating Re?
|
|
December 8, 2015, 05:07 |
|
#26 |
Senior Member
Sultan Islam
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Canada
Posts: 137
Rep Power: 10 |
||
December 8, 2015, 05:22 |
|
#27 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,710
Rep Power: 143 |
Yes, I already guessed that......
But what density? How did you define it? And how did you calculate it? Same for Velocity and dyn viscosity. |
|
December 8, 2015, 05:31 |
|
#28 |
Senior Member
Sultan Islam
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Canada
Posts: 137
Rep Power: 10 |
I set the velocity which I calculated using the solver. The density is the density of air which I defined in cfx pre. I got dynamic viscosity from the solver.
|
|
December 8, 2015, 06:15 |
|
#29 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,710
Rep Power: 143 |
How did you define the velocity? How did you calculate it?
Is the fluid incompressible and constant properties? |
|
December 8, 2015, 14:22 |
|
#30 |
Senior Member
Sultan Islam
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Canada
Posts: 137
Rep Power: 10 |
||
December 8, 2015, 16:48 |
|
#31 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,710
Rep Power: 143 |
OK, so density and dyn viscosity are easy to define. Now we just need to find how you defined the velocity. You say "I set the velocity which I calculated using the solver", so which velocity? An average? Freestream? At a certain point?
|
|
December 8, 2015, 18:22 |
|
#32 |
Senior Member
Sultan Islam
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Canada
Posts: 137
Rep Power: 10 |
I fixed it, I used the velocity at the freestream using the probe function. I am getting the correct Reynolds number at the end of the plate at x=5.09016m
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ansys SIG$ILL error | loth | ANSYS | 3 | December 24, 2015 05:31 |
2-way FSI in Ansys CFX 15 | LucasGasparino | CFX | 3 | August 6, 2015 03:17 |
Flat plate and Boundary conditions | Ravenn | FLUENT | 1 | March 10, 2013 18:39 |
results for flow past flat plate normal to flow | lisa | Main CFD Forum | 2 | August 30, 2005 16:36 |
flat plate boundary layer data | Ekachai Juntasaro | Main CFD Forum | 3 | March 13, 2001 23:18 |