|
[Sponsors] |
it is agood idea to increase number of itreation in steady state |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
May 1, 2016, 08:45 |
it is agood idea to increase number of itreation in steady state
|
#1 |
Senior Member
yaseen
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Hawler
Posts: 174
Rep Power: 10 |
hello
It is a good idea to increase number of iteration in steady state in my free surface model I increased till 1400 iteration but the solver does not reach 10^-4 residual. also my mesh quality is good and physics, boundary conditions are correct, so it is need to further increased or go to transient simulation. in my research I want compare the result of transient and steady simulation but unfortunately it does not convergence in steady. thanks |
|
May 2, 2016, 02:34 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Maxim
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Germany
Posts: 415
Rep Power: 12 |
If your steady-state simulation has not converged after 1400 iterations, then it won't converge if you add more iterations. Since you are sure that your mesh and boundary conditions and physics are correct, you could change your timestep. For my steady-state simulation, I start with a large timestep and decrease it after about 150 iterations to get tighter convergence.
In case you have non-steady-state (transient) flow phenomena in your setup, only a transient simulation will help you to converge further. Last edited by -Maxim-; May 2, 2016 at 04:07. Reason: typo |
|
May 2, 2016, 03:37 |
|
#3 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,703
Rep Power: 143 |
This question is an FAQ: http://www.cfd-online.com/Wiki/Ansys...gence_criteria
|
|
May 2, 2016, 07:46 |
|
#4 | |
Senior Member
yaseen
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Hawler
Posts: 174
Rep Power: 10 |
Quote:
but in steady state there is no time step, do you mean by time scale ? please response me |
||
May 2, 2016, 07:51 |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
Maxim
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Germany
Posts: 415
Rep Power: 12 |
yes, it's timescale in steady-state. I would recommend 'Auto timescale' in case you're not completely sure what you are doing. You will find more information about it in the documentation and here in countless posts in this forum.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[snappyHexMesh] Error snappyhexmesh - Multiple outside loops | avinashjagdale | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 53 | March 8, 2019 09:42 |
decomposePar pointfield | flying | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 28 | December 30, 2013 15:05 |
is it possible to predict how long it takes to reach steady state solution in unstead | Alimohamadi_nasr | CFX | 4 | November 11, 2013 06:11 |
Constant velocity of the material | Sas | CFX | 15 | July 13, 2010 08:56 |
About the difference between steady and unsteady problems | Lisa | Main CFD Forum | 11 | July 5, 2000 14:37 |