CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

Eulerian vs Lagrangian

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   April 17, 2001, 01:14
Default Eulerian vs Lagrangian
  #1
Helal
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Can anybody explain the basic differences between the Eulerian and Lagrangian Particle Tracking?

Regards,

Helal
  Reply With Quote

Old   April 17, 2001, 07:12
Default Re: Eulerian vs Lagrangian
  #2
Jan Rusås
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
In the Eulerian approach is both the fluid/gas and the particles treated as continuum and continuum equations are solved for both phases with an appropriate interaction. In the Lagrangian approach, is the fluid/gas still treated as continuum, but the particulate phase is treated as single particles, where particle trajectories, representing a stream of particles, are calculated as a result of forces acting on them.

The Eulerian model is typically used, when there are many particles, high mass loading,.

Hope it helps

Regards Jan
  Reply With Quote

Old   April 17, 2001, 20:53
Default Re: Eulerian vs Lagrangian
  #3
Helal
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Dear Jan,

Many thanks for your excellent explanations.

Could you please explain which approach is suitable for coal combustion modelling?

In CFX4 Lagrangian approach has been used.

Regards,

Helal
  Reply With Quote

Old   April 18, 2001, 00:00
Default Re: Eulerian vs Lagrangian
  #4
Dan Williams
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Seems to me that this would depend on what part of the coal combustion modelling you are interested in simulating.

If you are interested in the region near a nozzle outlet, where the particles might behave as a single fluid, then an eulerian model would probably be fine. In addition to that, the particles must also be of roughly uniform diameter (which is probabably not the case).

However, if you are wanting to simulate regions further from an injection port, where the particles have spread out a fair bit, and will likely have a uneven spread of particle diameters then a lagrangian approach is likely the better candidate.

CFX-4 can do either.

Dan.
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Conversion of computed velocities in Lagrangian coordinates to Eulerian coordinates SMM STAR-CD 4 June 5, 2011 09:20
lagrangian and eulerian representaions kakollu Main CFD Forum 14 February 12, 2010 12:35
lagrangian vs eulerian approach leopoldo luongo CFX 1 June 19, 2006 10:12
Arbitrary Lagrangian Eulerian Methods Soheyl Main CFD Forum 1 June 12, 2006 03:42
Comparison between Eulerian and Lagrangian Models Ricardo Damian CFX 0 September 3, 2001 19:13


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:04.