CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

Different itterations i CFX 5.5.1

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   January 15, 2003, 13:24
Default Different itterations i CFX 5.5.1
  #1
Michael Rasmussen
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi

I have a question regarding the number of itteration pr. equation. In CFX 4.4 I remember there is an option where it can be defined that the hydrodynamical equation should be itterated f.ex. 5 times and the scalar should be itterated f.ex. 3 times.

This was very helpfull when solving transient transport of a scalar in stationary flow. First the stationary solution was found and the model restarted with the solution as initial guess. Then the hydrodynamical equations was not solved (no. itt =0), but the transport equations were (no itt = 3).

-It increased the overall computational speed.

Is it possible to do something similar in 5.5.1 ?

Regards Michael
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 15, 2003, 13:42
Default Re: Different itterations i CFX 5.5.1
  #2
Astrid
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
You have to set

Solve fluids = false

in the Expert Parameter Section. This will switch off u,v,w, and p. Similarily you can make adjustments for energy, turbulence equations and so on. It is not possible nor is it necessary to adjust the number of iterations. Except for the situations where Mach > 2.4, where you are advised to increase the number of continuity loops.

Astrid
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 15, 2003, 16:07
Default Re: Different itterations i CFX 5.5.1
  #3
Robin
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi Michael,

For a transient simulation, one can specify how many inner iterations are performed per outer timestep and this may be done per equation class.

In general, what you are suggesting is necessary in CFX-4 as it uses a segregated solver. Since CFX-5 uses a coupled-multigrid approach, there is no need to specify additional inner loops since the solver is already doing the extra work.

If you are solving a scalar equation which does not effect the flow, then doing as Astrid suggests is OK. I would recommend converging the flow first, then solving the scalar equation with fluids off.

In the end, solving a scalar equation is relatively inexpensive, so I would just leave it on throughout and save myself the extra work. The progress of the scalar equation solution can be sped up by specifying a larger timestep for the additional transport equation.

Regards, Robin

  Reply With Quote

Old   January 15, 2003, 20:45
Default Re: Different itterations i CFX 5.5.1
  #4
Swapnil
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi Robin,

Will you please explain the concept behind switching off particular equtions? What's the benefit in doing this (Will you please site some good examples)

Regards,

Swapnil
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 16, 2003, 21:16
Default Re: Different itterations i CFX 5.5.1
  #5
Robin
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
If you are tracking the path of an additional scalar and already have a solution of the hydrodynamics equation, you can speed things up significantly if you are not trying to further converge the hydrodynamic equations. Thus, in such a situation you may choose to turn these off and only solve for the additional scalar.

Robin
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CFX 5.5.1 Streamline Plot Satchit Panse CFX 3 March 8, 2005 12:58
CFX 5.5.1 for 2D work blair CFX 9 May 20, 2003 10:29
CFX 5.5.1 and LES - maximal residuals Olivier Macchion CFX 4 January 22, 2003 06:43
Meshing error on CFX 5.5.1 Bruno Sersante CFX 6 October 4, 2002 02:09
CFX 5.5.1 stirred tank and LES problem Nishant CFX 2 September 13, 2002 07:11


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:22.