# Total Energy -thermal energy

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 October 13, 2007, 03:11 Total Energy -thermal energy #1 Herold Guest   Posts: n/a Hello, I have a problem. I am not sure if I have to use the thermal energy or the total energy model for my Fluid. I am using water from the IAPWS library. I have high pressure and water with 200 °C with low density and I am injecting water with 25 °C and higher density in a pipe. Because of the density difference do I have to use compressible flow with the total energy model or is it OK to use the thermal energy? Thx for all your help.

 October 15, 2007, 03:16 Re: Total Energy -thermal energy #2 Chirag Guest   Posts: n/a Of course you get to model compressible flow if density difference is significant and/or you want to capture change in density. Best luck, Chirag

 January 26, 2012, 11:43 Models for Greenhouse. Help me please. #3 New Member   Hector A Gómez P Join Date: Jan 2012 Posts: 3 Rep Power: 5 In the case of a greenhouse. What models use? I have radiation, also compressible fluid and air currents to 12 m / s. Free convection, radiation and turbulence effects. Help me? Thank you. greetings.

 January 26, 2012, 17:25 #4 Super Moderator   Glenn Horrocks Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Sydney, Australia Posts: 10,803 Rep Power: 85 Can you describe what you are trying to learn from your model? That determines what physics you are interested in. Air is compressible but it is unlikely that is significant in a greenhouse. You can probably use incompressible air with bousinesq buoyancy.

 January 26, 2012, 17:56 #5 New Member   Hector A Gómez P Join Date: Jan 2012 Posts: 3 Rep Power: 5 Do you know the solar chimney system? solar collector, as a greenhouse A chimney. I was thinking it could disregard the compressibility of air. The speeds are not high. I hope a speed of 12 to 20 m / s. I have doubts about how to place the boundary conditions for the radiation. Also that use models. I thought about Total energy model if I take the compressible air or in the opposite case of a thermal energy model. Do you combine it with the K-e standard? Thanks, I'm just starting on this.

 January 26, 2012, 18:05 #6 Super Moderator   Glenn Horrocks Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Sydney, Australia Posts: 10,803 Rep Power: 85 Yes, I know of solar chimneys. What is the range of densities you would expect in this system? Whether you model radiation directly or just apply it as a heat source depends on what you are trying to achieve. You can use any turbulence model. The choice of turbulence model is independent of the heat source. I would recommend using SST as the normal default choice unless you have a good reason to do otherwise.

 June 20, 2012, 15:11 #7 New Member   Hector A Gómez P Join Date: Jan 2012 Posts: 3 Rep Power: 5 Hello ghorrocks. I tested differents models, but I don't feel happy with my model. I found velocities approximate of other research, but I don't Know if is casuality. I explain: The diferential of temperature expected is 17.5 degrees, therefore I couldn't use the bousinessq buoyancy, or yes? I read that it's not advisable use approximation of boussinessq with diferential of temperature over 10 degrees. I want measure the velocities and mass flow. Also the temperature for stablish relations with the power. Therefore I set the model so: a) Fluid: Gas ideal: default set Bouyancy Activated: g=9.81, Bouy. reference density: 1.185 b) thermal Model: Thermal energy (I need change the thermal model for total energy model?) c) Turbulence Model: SST d) Bouyance Turbulence: None e) Thermal Radiation: none f)The boundary conditions are: Absortion in the soil Generation of heat in the cover the greenhouse. In and out: Opening with pressure value and temperature. you can given me suggestions?? Best Regards. Thank you for you help

June 20, 2012, 18:36
#8
Super Moderator

Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,803
Rep Power: 85
Quote:
 The diferential of temperature expected is 17.5 degrees, therefore I couldn't use the bousinessq buoyancy, or yes?
It depends on how accurate you want to be. You are starting to get into the range where material property changes make a few % difference.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Joseph CFX 14 April 20, 2010 15:45 vijeshjoshi23 CFX 5 October 9, 2009 10:31 vijeshjoshi23 Main CFD Forum 0 October 8, 2009 02:29 prayskyer CFX 2 June 19, 2006 19:52 Harry Dong Main CFD Forum 12 February 4, 2006 01:55

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:40.