|
[Sponsors] |
May 19, 2008, 18:23 |
Vorteks shedding Fluent vs. CFX
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
When doing a simulation of flow around a cylinder (same mesh, reynolds number, time step etc...) we see always different transient results between cfx and fluent. We tried fine meshes, small time steps...steady-state is not so different. Which code is correct do you think? Have you try to compare fluent and cfx on the same case? do you have same results give or take a few? thanks |
|
May 19, 2008, 22:32 |
Re: Vorteks shedding Fluent vs. CFX
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
First, i recommend you to make a comparison with experimental data. I think itīs more important, after that, you can choose a software that u want to work. I made 2 comparisons with 2 experimental data and i had different deviations (with different cases).
After that, I made a comparison only with femlab (2D study) and CFX 11 (3D study) for conducting heat transfer (only solid domain) and i had the same results between cfx and femlab. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mesh and Solve Times for CFX, Fluent, CD-adapco | Jade M | Main CFD Forum | 4 | August 28, 2012 02:54 |
Fluent and CFX | Ale | Main CFD Forum | 7 | July 30, 2008 21:14 |
CFX forum Vs Fluent University forum | Amvy | CFX | 4 | February 12, 2008 16:44 |
Fluent Vs CFX, density and pressure | Omer | CFX | 9 | June 28, 2007 04:13 |
Jobs in cfd - fluent or cfx? | jobman | Main CFD Forum | 6 | July 5, 2006 15:02 |