|
[Sponsors] |
January 29, 2009, 10:25 |
GGI connection mesh size
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello,
I am doing a CFX analysis on a fluid pump that uses a wear ring gap. The wear ring gap connects my suction to volute. It is very tiny--its thickness is about 1/10 the mesh size of my model. I was wondering if anyone knows if there is maximum ratio between mesh sizes when using a GGI connection--thus, how much do I need to refine the mesh at the area where I will connect the wear ring gap. If anyone has encountered this problem and has any tips I would greatly appreciate it. Thanks. |
|
January 29, 2009, 17:38 |
Re: GGI connection mesh size
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
In my experience you may have convergence problems but it is a bit problem dependent. If you want to accurately resolve the leakage flow then you will certainly need more refinements, but exactly how much will require a sensitivity analysis to determine. Often leakage flows are adequately resolved by only a small number of elements, say 5 to 10. Glenn Horrocks |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[snappyHexMesh] SnappyHexMesh for internal Flow | vishwa | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 24 | June 27, 2016 08:54 |
unstructure mesh size control near to wall using gambit | lalit kumar | FLUENT | 4 | July 6, 2010 15:13 |
OF 1.6 | Ubuntu 9.10 (64bit) | GLIBCXX_3.4.11 not found | piprus | OpenFOAM Installation | 22 | February 25, 2010 13:43 |
Phase locked average in run time | panara | OpenFOAM | 2 | February 20, 2008 14:37 |
Convergence moving mesh | lr103476 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 30 | November 19, 2007 14:09 |