 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
[Sponsors] | ||||
December 31, 2012, 05:15
|
|
#41 |
|
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,709
Rep Power: 143  |
There is no inconsistency with removing the [s] from t but keeping it on the 1 [s]. The t already has units of time defined, so you do not need to define it again. This is the whole point of what I am saying.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Tutorial to help tank sloshing modelling (CFX 12.1) | enghamed | CFX | 15 | August 27, 2019 17:45 |
| Tank sloshing in fluent diverging...need help | lostin4ever | FLUENT | 4 | February 24, 2010 07:20 |
| URANS in ANSYS CFX | brissyben | CFX | 3 | October 6, 2009 17:35 |
| CFX transition to being part of Ansys | CFXQuestion | CFX | 12 | September 8, 2003 09:00 |
| CFX 5.5.1 stirred tank and LES problem | Nishant | CFX | 2 | September 13, 2002 07:11 |
Linear Mode
