
[Sponsors] 
December 24, 2010, 06:03 
Tank sloshing in ansys cfx

#1 
Member
Hamed
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 43
Rep Power: 7 
Hi,
I'm using 12.1 version and probably could move to 13. My goal is to model water sloshing in a storage tank under siesmic forces. I believe I should use VOF. Any suggestion on how to model this will be appreciated. Should I do this by changing the gravity vector or moving wall B.C. or moving mesh? Regrds; Hamed 

December 27, 2010, 12:39 

#2 
New Member
Hareesh R Iyer
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Thiruvananthapuram
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 6 
the wall need not be movable. If the tank has a symmetrical geometry, a plane of symmetry also has to be incorporated in the model, in short 1/4th or 1/2 of the tank need to be modeled. the mesh should be moving mesh at the plane of symmetry. for 3D slosh model, the moving mesh should be given from symmetry plane towards the wall but not essentially up to the wall.


December 28, 2010, 05:09 

#3 
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,832
Rep Power: 85 
This question has been asked many times before. Do a search to find previous posts.
But in short the easiest way is to move the gravity vector, but it only approximates the true motion so you have to assess whether the approximation is good enough. Moving mesh is the most correct way, but is much more computationally expensive. And sorry Haga, I have no idea what you are talking about. What have symmetry planes got to do with it? 

December 28, 2010, 20:19 

#4 
New Member
Hareesh R Iyer
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Thiruvananthapuram
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 6 
@ghorroks symmetry plane only for viewing the 2D slosh pattern. nothing else. am now trying different tank geometries. all are symmetric geometrically


January 4, 2011, 19:16 

#5 
Member
Hamed
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 43
Rep Power: 7 
Dear Ghorroks,
Thanks for your reply. Can you please help me on the moving mesh? I have a circular tank of 10m diameter and 6 meter height. Where should I specify the mesh motion? Should it be specified displacement with any particular equation? As Haga said can I model half of it and put symmetry BC or have to model all of it? For the gravity change, which you said is approximation, where can I apply the equation for the gravity change? I really appreciate your help. Regards; Hamed 

January 4, 2011, 19:47 

#6 
Member
Hamed
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 43
Rep Power: 7 
Hi again,
Sorry but I have two more questions. My tank is completely closed (no inlet and out let) so can I use moving wall for simulating the sloshing or as you said the best way is mesh motion? My second question: How can I know if I should use laminar or turbulent model? Any idea which turbulence model is better for this? Regards; 

January 5, 2011, 14:38 

#7 
Senior Member
Edmund Singer P.E.
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 494
Rep Power: 11 
No, make the entire tank a subdomain and move the subdomain to simulate the tank movement.


January 6, 2011, 02:50 

#8 
Member
Hamed
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 43
Rep Power: 7 
Thanks singer1812,
Can you please tell me how can I move the subdomain? Will this involve mesh motion? Regards; Hamed 

January 6, 2011, 10:01 

#9 
Senior Member
Edmund Singer P.E.
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 494
Rep Power: 11 
It is moving mesh, but you are moving the entire mesh (domain). Just create the subdomain, with your input function for mesh (tank) motion on the subdomain.


January 10, 2011, 01:54 

#10 
Member
Hamed
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 43
Rep Power: 7 
Dear Singer1812,
Thank you very much for your help. So if I have a tank which is fixed to ground which goes under a base movement of for example X=Asinwt, I should model the entire tank, put wall B.C on faces and create a subdoamin and put the mentioned equation for the sub domain as the mesh displacement input? Am i getting it right? Many thanks, 

January 10, 2011, 10:31 

#11 
Senior Member
Edmund Singer P.E.
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 494
Rep Power: 11 
That is the general idea. The mesh movement will work fine. If it is a high frequency movement, I am not sure how well or easy the simulation will run.


January 26, 2011, 11:44 

#12 
New Member
Kevin
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 
I usually just apply a general momentum source (on subdomain) with the known force definition. No mesh motion requred with this approach and no limitation on moving frequency.
"S=rho*a", where "a" denotes accerlation, =du/dt. Care should be taken with the sign of "a", it's opposite to the tank moving direction. 

January 26, 2011, 19:22 

#13 
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,832
Rep Power: 85 
Yes, this is a good approach, but note the application of an acceleration as a general momentum source is an approximation and may not be accurate for some types of flow. Need to assess whether it is suitable on a casebycase basis.


January 31, 2011, 21:15 
@enghamed

#14 
New Member
Hareesh R Iyer
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Thiruvananthapuram
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 6 
check for any available experimental data on this


July 30, 2011, 05:48 

#15  
New Member
vipul
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 6 
Quote:
Hello, i am also solving similar problem. circular tank under seismic load i have acc. vs frequency(example frequency converted in time period (5 sec. i have acc. value for that time period now i have to divide time period in 4 intervals of 1.25 each and simulteniously changing the direction of acceleration to simulate motion similar to to and fro motion) values i am loking for pressure on all walls due to seismic effect.I also want suggestion to solve it with dynamic mesh or with playing with acceleration values in operation conditons. 

July 30, 2011, 05:50 

#16 
New Member
vipul
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 6 
Hello, i am also solving soloshing problem. circular tank under seismic load i have acc. vs frequency chart(floor spectrum)(example frequency converted in time period (5 sec. i have acc. value for that time period now i have to divide time period in 4 intervals of 1.25 each and simulteniously changing the direction of acceleration to simulate motion similar to to and fro motion) values i am loking for pressure on all walls due to seismic effect.I also want suggestion to solve it with dynamic mesh or with playing with acceleration values in operation conditons.


July 30, 2011, 05:50 

#17  
New Member
vipul
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 6 
Quote:


July 30, 2011, 08:07 

#18 
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,832
Rep Power: 85 
I guess posting the same post three times is a quick way of getting your post count up.
To answer your question  you can solve it either by moving mesh or moving the gravity vector. Moving the gravity vector is simpler but does not account for all inertial effects  whether this is important in your case is up to you to decide. 

August 1, 2011, 01:29 

#19  
New Member
vipul
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 6 
Quote:
Last edited by vipul; August 1, 2011 at 03:14. 

August 1, 2011, 07:48 

#20 
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,832
Rep Power: 85 
This is th CFX forum, you won't get much Fluent help here. Try the fluent forum. And I do not give out my email to people on the forum. If you have a question or comment you can post it on the forum.


Thread Tools  
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Tutorial to help tank sloshing modelling (CFX 12.1)  enghamed  CFX  13  August 21, 2011 20:43 
Tank sloshing in fluent diverging...need help  lostin4ever  FLUENT  4  February 24, 2010 08:20 
URANS in ANSYS CFX  brissyben  CFX  3  October 6, 2009 17:35 
CFX transition to being part of Ansys  CFXQuestion  CFX  12  September 8, 2003 09:00 
CFX 5.5.1 stirred tank and LES problem  Nishant  CFX  2  September 13, 2002 07:11 