CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLOW-3D

Flowrate through flux surface

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   February 11, 2009, 11:16
Default Flowrate through flux surface
  #1
Julien Pralong
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Dear Users,

considering incoherences between the results of the flowrates calculated and the plots given by Flow3d 9.3, I would like to know how the flux surfaces are interpolated in the mesh, and then how the flowrate is calculated.

More precicely, is the flux surface sensitive with the proximity of a limit of the mesh?

Thanks

Julien
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 11, 2009, 14:43
Default Re: Flowrate through flux surface
  #2
MC
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Are you using flux planes to calculate the volumetric flowrates? What variables are you looking at? Are you looking at the mesh volumetric flowrates? What version are you using?
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 11, 2009, 15:00
Default Re: Flowrate through flux surface
  #3
Julien Pralong
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I am using Flow3D v9.3, trying to measure a volumic flowrate through a baffle define as a flux surface. I don't use particles, I suppose the software integrates the velocities on the plane...but how? in which cells? What about cells that are not entirely part of the flux surface?

My aim is to qualify the distribution of the flow over a crest, so that I have placed a lot of juxtaposed baffles...but the distribution seems to be strange...so comes my question.

Thx

Julien
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 11, 2009, 16:03
Default Re: Flowrate through flux surface
  #4
MC
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
A baffle flux surface should be placed on a cell surface, if it isn't then it will take the nearest face velocity. Also, if you have a circular baffle and if in one cell, it only occupies 1/16 or less than 1/2 then it will not use that area in the calculation.
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 14, 2009, 22:05
Default Re: Flowrate through flux surface
  #5
Michael
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi Julien,

Flux surfaces are defined with 100% open baffles and, therefore, behave like baffles in the way they interact with mesh. A baffle is located at cells faces; if it is defined not at a cell face, it will be moved to the nearest face by the pre-processor. Also, a cell face is either fully occupied by the baffle or not at all, depending on whether its original definition blocks more or less than 50% of the face.

Baffles and flux surfaces can be visualized in 3D using the Favorize tool in Meshing & Geometry.

The flow rate at a flux surface is integrated over all cell faces occupied by it.

One additional limitation in the flux surface tool is that any two flux surfaces must be at least two cells apart for the flow rates at both of them to be accurate.

Michael
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 16, 2009, 11:40
Default Re: Flowrate through flux surface
  #6
Julien Pralong
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi Michael,

I understand that, in order to make my flux surface measures accurate, i should set a fixed point at its limiters coordinates. But in that case, if I juxtapose my baffles, it should work, isn't it?

Do you mean that if my flux surface only takes place on less than 50 % of the cell face, this one is eliminated from the integration area? And that on the other hand, if more than 50 %%, the velocity is integrated on all the cell's face?

This two cells which should separate two flux surfaces only avoid integrating the velocities on the same cells for both of the flux surfaces, is that right?

Thanks a lot

Julien
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 22, 2009, 13:06
Default Re: Flowrate through flux surface
  #7
michael barkhudarov
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi Julien,

I am not sure how you juxtapose baffles. Could you give more details?

You are right about the 50% logic.

I forgot what the two-cell separation is for :~) I will find out this week, let you know.

Michael
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 2, 2009, 08:46
Default Re: Flowrate through flux surface
  #8
Julien Pralong
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
In fact, I just set the baffle like in the following example:

baf 1 : definition : x = 2 limiters : yl = 1; yh = 2

baf 2 : definition : x = 2 limiters : yl = 2; yh = 3

Setting a fixed point between the baffle (i.e. y = 2 here), I have already got better results, but should I believe in the accuracy of these ones?

Julien
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 7, 2010, 23:11
Default
  #9
New Member
 
kent sun
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 7
sunxiao is on a distinguished road
Have you got the flow rate by the baffle?
if that is the case, could you tell me how to do it?
I am trying get the volume flow rate by the baffle (flux surface), but it didn't work.
Thank u!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Julien Pralong
;93242
In fact, I just set the baffle like in the following example:

baf 1 : definition : x = 2 limiters : yl = 1; yh = 2

baf 2 : definition : x = 2 limiters : yl = 2; yh = 3

Setting a fixed point between the baffle (i.e. y = 2 here), I have already got better results, but should I believe in the accuracy of these ones?

Julien
sunxiao is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Recover surface from surface mesh in IcemCFD Jerry Tanner CFX 0 August 20, 2008 12:48
Total heat transf. rate vs Total surface heat flux Renato Sousa FLUENT 0 August 22, 2005 10:34
monitoring dynamic heat flux through a surface abdnakhi FLUENT 0 August 15, 2005 09:57
Radiation flux to the wall surface Jason Phoenics 1 May 26, 2004 01:13
CFX4.3 -build analysis form Chie Min CFX 5 July 12, 2001 23:19


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:13.