|
[Sponsors] |
February 17, 2005, 05:53 |
Accessing wall shear stress using UDF
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi
I am trying to access the wall shear stress/forces using an UDF. I know that this topic have been discussed here on this forum previously. But I can however not solve my problem using the information in these posts. In order to keep things simple I am runing 2D axy-symetric pipe flow. My grid is 3x20. My UDF looks as follows and are intended to return the wall shear forces #include "udf.h" #include "storage.h" DEFINE_ON_DEMAND(output) { Domain *domain; Thread *f_thread; face_t f; int ID=4; /* from the BC panel */ real wallshear[ND_ND]; domain = Get_Domain(1); f_thread=Lookup_Thread(domain,ID); begin_f_loop(f,f_thread){ NV_V(wallshear,=,C_STORAGE_R_NV(f,f_thread,SV_WALL _SHEAR)); printf("%2.10e %2.10e\n",wallshear[0],wallshear[1]); } end_f_loop(f,f_thread) } When it is executed it returns two columns with 20 values each. You would expect these two to be the wall shear forces in the radial and axial direction respectively. What happens is that I get a non zero value on every third row. I expected to get zeros in the first column and non zero values in the second collumn. Any suggestions to what might be wrong? There is obviusly something wrong when I try to access the vector wallshear. I have noticed that the non zero values when divided by the area of the wall face are identical to the wall shear stresses in the axial direction reported by Fluent. So I guess that I am not that far off. Best Regards Robert |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UDF for shear stress at wall in laminar flow | Jafri | FLUENT | 1 | April 6, 2020 18:20 |
Natural convection in a closed domain STILL NEEDING help! | Yr0gErG | FLUENT | 4 | December 2, 2019 00:04 |
Problems with wall shear stress. | xiexiehezuo | FLUENT | 1 | September 22, 2009 12:26 |
Re: About wall shear stress | Mike | FLUENT | 9 | November 17, 2003 14:41 |
Wall shear stress in a UDF | Jafri | FLUENT | 3 | December 6, 2002 17:29 |