|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 3 ![]() |
Hello all,
I tried to do the tutorial of the cornell website for the turbulent flow, with the pipe dimenstion 8mX0.1m. and the inlet velocity of 1 m/s. choosing k-epsilon turbulence flow. but choosing material as water ( density-1000 kg/m3, and viscosity 0.0007 pa.s). I tried to make the mesh fine, to have low yplus ( I obtained yplus about 0.3 for fully developerd flow). but i wonder why the skin friction coefficient is 3.5 while in the moody diagram the maximum value is 0.1? why my result doesn't match with moody diagram. i attached the skin friction plot here. thanks skin friction.jpg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Lucky Tran
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 427
Rep Power: 9 ![]() |
Did you remember to set your reference values? A reference velocity is used to calculate the skin friction coefficient. Not sure what the default in Fluent is. You should set it your bulk velocity (average cross sectional velocity) I believe. Also check to make sure the reference density is correct.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 3 ![]() |
Aaaahh!! you are right!!! thank you sooo much for the response, I put many times and trying different meshes!! now i tried to put reference values and it seems it's ok. thanks again
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| skin friction coefficient, turbulence |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Macro for skin friction and pressure coefficient | DoHander | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 0 | January 9, 2010 10:18 |
| Plot skin friction coefficient on a airfoil | dinonettis | OpenFOAM Paraview & paraFoam | 3 | April 23, 2009 07:24 |
| Compute Skin friction coef by hand | Francois | FLUENT | 1 | February 10, 2006 06:21 |
| Skin Friction Coefficient | FrenchyTim | FLUENT | 8 | March 31, 2005 11:42 |
| Multicomponent fluid | Andrea | CFX | 2 | October 11, 2004 05:12 |