CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

Orthogonality Problem

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By davidwilcox

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   October 29, 2012, 15:09
Default Orthogonality Problem
  #1
Member
 
sadjad.s's Avatar
 
sadjad
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 60
Rep Power: 5
sadjad.s is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Yahoo to sadjad.s
hi everybody,
i made a grid which due to Complexity, and making small elements with Y+=1 near wall, quality of grid is as follows:
maximum skewness: 0.87
orthogonal quality: 4.0e-4

i've heard that there is no serious problem with skewness below 0.9 in 3d.(although help suggests that maintain maximum skewness below 0.8).
but i couldn't find any suggestion for orthogonal quality!
my question is can i trust results?
sadjad.s is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 30, 2012, 03:19
Default
  #2
Member
 
david
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 57
Rep Power: 4
davidwilcox is on a distinguished road
Hi Sadjad,
There is a scheme in the Solver called Piso. It allows you to put it a skewness correction factor. You might want to play with that. Pertaining to your question as whether you can trust the results, I would say this is CFD. In other words, the results can only be validated if you compare them with experimental data. The skewness affects the Jacobian matrix ie the calculation of your gradients. So you might wanna play with the correction factor until you get reasonable results. If you're interested in things like the shear layer, it's gonna take a lil bit of an effort. Hope this helps.
sadjad.s likes this.
davidwilcox is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 31, 2012, 14:31
Default
  #3
Member
 
sadjad.s's Avatar
 
sadjad
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 60
Rep Power: 5
sadjad.s is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Yahoo to sadjad.s
thanks mate,
this is it! actually that's why some call it Colorful fluid dynamics, because you can not trust results 100% without validating.
but i already wonder how much those errors made by orthogonality problem (which was not a criteria in fluent 6.3) can affect results.
and also skewness is within safe range.
by the way i'm doing high reynolds modelling, and i have to use Density base, where there is no possibility of using PISO scheme.
sadjad.s is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
UDF compiling problem Wouter Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming 6 June 6, 2012 04:43
Gambit - meshing over airfoil wrapping (?) problem JFDC FLUENT 1 July 11, 2011 05:59
natural convection problem for a CHT problem Se-Hee CFX 2 June 10, 2007 06:29
Adiabatic and Rotating wall (Convection problem) ParodDav CFX 5 April 29, 2007 19:13
Is this problem well posed? Thomas P. Abraham Main CFD Forum 5 September 8, 1999 14:52


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:14.